You are reading the article Why Retina Display Is More Than Twice As Responsive As The Competition updated in December 2023 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Why Retina Display Is More Than Twice As Responsive As The Competition
Say what you will, but Apple owns the most responsive mobile OS and has the smoothest multitouch implementation by leaps and bounds.
Unsurprisingly, the Retina display hardware is a major part of that accomplishment – and I’m not talking about pixel density or image quality.
No, the key contributing factor to the iPhone’s multitouch immediacy is the short response time of the device’s touch panel on the hardware level. In fact, Apple’s capacitive touchscreen implementation runs circles around competition, a recent barrage of tests have proven.
The iPhone 5’s four-inch Retina screen is significantly faster than any of its rivals – up to twice as fast as its nearest competitor. Jump past the fold for detailed findings…
Agawi recently carried out a series of TouchMark tests to determine the touchscreen response times of a few popular smartphones like Apple’s iPhone 5 and iPhone 4, Samsung’s Galaxy S4, Nokia’s Lumia 928, Motorola’s Moto X and HTC’s One.
As seen on the chart top of post (lower is better), the iPhone 5’s Retina screen is more than twice as responsive as Samsung’s Galaxy S4 (or any Android or Windows Phone 8 device tested) and more than 50 percent faster than its predecessor, the iPhone 4.
Since touchscreen hardware has significant latency itself, our best guess at Agawi is that Apple’s touchscreen hardware is better optimized or more sensitively calibrated for capturing and processing touch.
Part of that owes to iOS processing touschscreen input way faster than Android. That’s because iOS is based on Objective C, a runtime environment that’s significantly snappier than Android’s Dalvik and CLR runtimes.
At the end of the day, this could be exactly why people are consistently praising Apple mobile devices’s fluidness and responsiveness.
As a result, “the best written apps on iPhones will simply feel more responsive than similar apps on the current gen of Android devices”. Plus, it could be why the iPhone’s keyboard “generally feels better than the Android keyboard to many people,” Agawi notes.
Agawi’s measurements could also indicate that the touchscreen lag – observed when moving your finger across the iPhone 5’s touchscreen in a rapid succession – may have been a software issue after all, one Apple has likely patched with one of iOS updates.
Touchscreen responsiveness is part hardware and part software.
That’s why Agawi has gone out its way to couple its in-house built Touchscope hardware (seen below) to custom software algorithms for accurate measurements. The kit measures the response time by capturing the time difference between activation of the Force Sensitive Resistor on the glove and the Light Sensitive Resistor positioned over the device.
The system also employs high frame rate cameras that capture footage at 240 frames per second – twice as fast as the iPhone 5s’s Slow-Mo mode – and a special app that flashes the screen white as quickly as possible in response to a touch.
“The apps contain minimal logic and use OpenGL/DirectX rendering to make sure the response is as quick as possible,” explains the team.
Agawi originally reported TouchMark scores twelve days ago, but we figured the findings were postworthy enough to share here for the sake of discussion.
The iPhone has always been famous for its fluid animations, responsive user interface and the best multi-touch implementation on any mobile device hands down. Therefore, it is encouraging Apple’s engineers have remained focused on these qualities throughout the years, don’t you think?
You're reading Why Retina Display Is More Than Twice As Responsive As The Competition
Warren Buffett said if someone owned all bitcoin around the world and offered it to him for US$25
From humble beginnings in 2008 to its 2023 price peak,Warren Buffett is not only the one
Thomas Peterffy took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal in 2023 warning of the dangers that bitcoin futures posed to capital markets. These days, the Hungarian-born billionaire got well versed in crypto speak. Peterffy, worth US$25 billion, said it’s prudent to have 2 percent to 3 percent of one’s personal wealth in cryptocurrencies, just in case fiat currency goes to “hell.” He owns some himself, while his firm Interactive Brokers Group Inc. recently offered customers the ability to trade Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash, after detecting “urgency” from its clients to get in on the action. Peterffy, 77, said Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers will offer the ability to trade another five to 10 coins or so starting this month. Munger has also referred to bitcoin as poison. At the shareholder meeting of The Daily Journal (DJCO), a newspaper publisher in Los Angeles where Munger serves as chairman, he called it “noxious.” It was definitely a bold statement but to be fair to bitcoin bulls, both Buffett and Munger have been wrong about the cryptocurrency. Buffett in particular. He first called bitcoin a “mirage” in 2014 — back when it was trading for about US$600. So even with the recent pullback, bitcoin has drastically outperformed the broader market, not to mention Berkshire stock and top Berkshire holdings like Apple (AAPL). That’s why some cryptocurrency experts think that investors should ignore Buffett’s and Munger’s repeated bitcoin bashing.Double Standards: The US$1 Billion Investment
Berkshire Hathaway made its crypto investment public with an SEC filing in February 2023. It revealed that Buffett’s company had purchased US$1 billion in shares of Nubank, a digital bank based in Brazil, and the largest of its kind in Latin America. Nubank is a so-called neobank, a type of bank that operates outside of the rules of the traditional banking system. The ‘crypto friendly’ digital bank’s investment unit, NuInvest, allows users to put money in a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF)—tapping a financial space that Berkshire’s leaders have shown little love for. Shockingly, this most recent speculation by Buffett’s organization in Nubank is not the first time they have dabbled in this market. Last year, Berkshire had effectively purchased a US$500 million stake in Nubank, months before the organization opened up to the world in December 2023.More Trending Stories
From humble beginnings in 2008 to its 2023 price peak, Bitcoin (BTC) has taken investors and the world for quite the ride. In just over a decade, the first cryptocurrency has spiked and crashed and rallied and fallen again, over and over, on the way to gaining a price in tens of thousands. Bitcoin is the king of cryptocurrencies as it strongly holds its number 1 position. Even though Bitcoin is highly volatile, many investors have high hopes for this cryptocurrency but still, few investors believe that investing in Bitcoin is nothing but putting your hard-earned cash in the dump yard. Investment guru Warren Buffett remained bearish about bitcoin , being certain the cryptocurrency would not “produce anything” regardless of its rise or fall in the future. At Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s annual shareholders’ meeting last weekend, Buffett said if someone owned all bitcoin around the world and offered it to him for US$25, he would not take it because he would then have to sell the crypto back to that person one way or another. Buffett stressed bitcoin’s lack of productivity as well. Well, this is not the first time Warren Buffett has used harsh words against Bitcoin. In 2023 at the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting, Buffett called bitcoin “probably rat poison squared” and warned investors against it. He has often compared the cryptocurrency to gold, saying that both assets are strictly speculative and don’t produce earnings and dividends as stocks do.Thomas Peterffy took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal in 2023 warning of the dangers that bitcoin futures posed to capital markets. These days, the Hungarian-born billionaire got well versed in crypto speak. Peterffy, worth US$25 billion, said it’s prudent to have 2 percent to 3 percent of one’s personal wealth in cryptocurrencies, just in case fiat currency goes to “hell.” He owns some himself, while his firm Interactive Brokers Group Inc. recently offered customers the ability to trade Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash, after detecting “urgency” from its clients to get in on the action. Peterffy, 77, said Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers will offer the ability to trade another five to 10 coins or so starting this month. Munger has also referred to bitcoin as poison. At the shareholder meeting of The Daily Journal (DJCO), a newspaper publisher in Los Angeles where Munger serves as chairman, he called it “noxious.” It was definitely a bold statement but to be fair to bitcoin bulls, both Buffett and Munger have been wrong about the cryptocurrency. Buffett in particular. He first called bitcoin a “mirage” in 2014 — back when it was trading for about US$600. So even with the recent pullback, bitcoin has drastically outperformed the broader market, not to mention Berkshire stock and top Berkshire holdings like Apple (AAPL). That’s why some cryptocurrency experts think that investors should ignore Buffett’s and Munger’s repeated bitcoin bashing.Berkshire Hathaway made its crypto investment public with an SEC filing in February 2023. It revealed that Buffett’s company had purchased US$1 billion in shares of Nubank, a digital bank based in Brazil, and the largest of its kind in Latin America. Nubank is a so-called neobank, a type of bank that operates outside of the rules of the traditional banking system. The ‘crypto friendly’ digital bank’s investment unit, NuInvest, allows users to put money in a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF)—tapping a financial space that Berkshire’s leaders have shown little love for. Shockingly, this most recent speculation by Buffett’s organization in Nubank is not the first time they have dabbled in this market. Last year, Berkshire had effectively purchased a US$500 million stake in Nubank, months before the organization opened up to the world in December 2023.
This story originally featured on Outdoor Life
You couldn’t pick a better time to get into traditional archery. There’s a wide variety of good, affordable gear. Plus, there are great online resources for new shooters (more on that in a moment).
However, there are a few hard truths about getting into trad. First, it’s going to be difficult—you will likely have the impulse to hurl that new bow through the woods on more than one occasion. Second, it’s going to take time—it took me about a year of shooting before I was competent with a recurve and another two years before I was really skilled with one. But if you keep after it, you’ll earn the opportunity to experience one of the purest and most exciting forms of hunting.
Starting with a solid foundation is key.
Until recently, there haven’t been any widely-available, standardized resources for learning how to shoot a trad bow. Without established mentors or coaches, most of us have been left to figure it out on our own. This is where Tom Clum Sr. of Rocky Mountain Specialty Gear comes in (read my full story about shooting with Tom here). Tom is a certified archery coach and a bowhunter at heart. He saw how he could adapt a target archery shot for hunting. The standardized “NTS” shot was developed by a US Olympic coach as a scientifically designed, and biomechanically efficient, repeatable shot, and it produces incredible accuracy and consistency.
Tom began teaching this method of shooting a recurve in his shop and has recently released an online class called SOLID Archery Mechanics. A one-time fee will give you unlimited access to all the info you would get if you were getting Clum’s coaching in person. It’s a substantial initial investment at $200, but having gone through the course myself, I can confidently say that it’s worth the money. I wish I’d had this information years ago when I was learning to shoot. It would have saved me years of frustration.
I am fully convinced that a person who goes through this course with a stretch band for a month before even picking up a bow will learn much faster than someone trying to learn by himself. Along with enrolling in Clum’s course, here’s what you need to get started.1. Stretch Bands
This is probably one of the most underrated tools for the trad archer. Even Olympic-level shooters use stretch bands, and you should too. They can be made in any number of ways, but a basic therapy band that gives you some flexible resistance is all you need. It allows you to simulate draw weight and develop your shot without holding up the weight of a bow, and as a bonus, you can take it anywhere. It’s not for building strength, but for working on all the intricacies of your shot.
When I learned the NTS method of shooting, all of the initial work was done on a stretch band. You will have to teach your brain completely new motor programs, using muscles in ways you haven’t before. This takes a lot of time and slow, isolated movements, which are perfect for the stretch band. You can work on those individual movements, then begin to blend them together into a smooth shot process. One guy I know who has been going through the course struggled and struggled to develop his shot with his bow. I suggested he get a stretch band and work on each individual part of his shot before finally meshing them together. A month later, his form looked way better, all from the stretch band.
The Fleetwood Edge traditional bow is a great option for new shooters. Fleetwood Edge2. Buy Your First Bow
Cost is another major consideration. Many high-end custom and semi-custom recurves and longbows will run upwards of $1,000. These bows are nice, and many of them shoot wonderfully, but don’t even consider one of these for your first bow. There are many affordable bows that are much better to start with, and there are a couple of reasons for that. First, you don’t want to tie a bunch of money up into something that you may decide isn’t for you. Also, as you become more comfortable and better at shooting, your preferences may change. You really need to have an established shot in order to tell which bow feels right for you. Even if you want to end up with a high-end bow, start cheap, then you’ll be better suited to find the bow that fits you best.
Finally, I recommend a takedown bow to start with. These typically utilize interchangeable limbs. This will allow you to start with very light limbs, and as your skill level and strength grow, you can just get a new set of limbs for the same bow. For any new shooter, I’d recommend bows like the Fleetwood Edge or Samick Sage. These are very affordable recurves with limbs in a variety of weights. They can sometimes have Q.C. issues, but overall, they are fantastic options for new shooters. Start with light limbs, and you can usually find heavier ones for $50-75.
Read Next: Shooting Lessons Learned from a Master of Traditional Archery3. Buy Your First Arrows
Tom Clum demonstrating “the hook.” Tom ClumThe Hook
It might look unbelievably simple, but a properly executed shot is much more complex than it seems. Each component of the shot lays a foundation for the next step. It might be difficult to see how one or two details will affect the outcome, but it all matters. It all starts with how you address or “hook” the string. If you’ve always done what feels natural, chances are, you’ve been doing it wrong. I sure was. The basic components of the hook are: 1) where the string sits on your fingers; 2) weight distribution. You want the string just in front of the first notch of your index finger, just behind it on your middle finger, and on the pad of your ring finger. Most of the weight will be on your middle finger, followed closely by your index finger. Finally, your ring finger should be holding just enough weight to keep the string from pinching your middle finger. Too much weight, and you will have added torque on your string and it will slightly change the tiller of the bow. This hook will also be the same for both split-finger and 3-under shooting.
Another critical component to the hook is maintaining what’s called a high wrist. If you think about how you carry a bucket of water, your wrist is slightly bent with your hand curling inward toward you. This is a position of strength. The “natural” way to pull a bow straight back bends your wrist in the opposite direction, into a weaker position (low wrist). Setting up a proper hook can be very uncomfortable at first, but don’t skip it. A proper hook will create the strongest holding position, and allow the string to blow through your fingers efficiently; eliminating sloppy releases. It will get easier, and it is a critical step in learning the rest of the shot.The Cognitive Shot
Once you’ve got the basics down, the rest is all mental. There are quite a few folks out there who will tell you that the best way to shoot a traditional bow is to shut off your brain and go by feel. This might feel good and comfortable, but it is not a consistent way to shoot a bow.
The mental side of shooting a bow is every bit as important as the physical. Accuracy and consistency come from doing the same thing, the same way, every time, and we can’t do that by going on auto-pilot. You must develop a rigid “checklist” that you run through on every single shot. When you’re learning, the process can seem complex and slow, but as you develop your shot, the checklist becomes more natural.
Cognitively running through your shot also allows you to analyze the process better and determine where you are having problems. When you are shooting cognitively, it’s easier to walk back through a shot that went awry and figure out the issues. Keeping your head in the game will help as you go through the SOLID Archery Mechanics program and learn to shoot, but developing your own cognitive checklist to hit each and every shot will also help you right where you’re at now.
KROTZ SPRINGS, LA – MAY 15: People look on at the flooded at the flooded Atchafalaya River during a mandatory evacuation on May 15, 2011 in Krotz Springs, Louisiana. The Morganza Spillway floodgates were opened for the first time in nearly forty years yesterday to lower the crest of the flooding Mississippi River. St. Landry Parish officials ordered a mandatory evacuation today for around 2000 residents in Krotz Springs and nearby Melville, Louisiana. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images). Mario Tama
The ongoing flooding along the Mississippi River is the worst the region has seen in recent memory–all three of the river’s three major spillways are open at the same time for the first time ever, diverting flood waters from New Orleans and one of America’s major fuel refining corridors. Other areas aren’t so lucky; water flowing from Louisiana’s Morganza spillway (one of the big three) is flooding the Atchafalaya River basin, displacing some 4,000 people. Scenes of inundated towns, rooftops peeking above the water line, are playing out from the upper Midwest to the Gulf of Mexico.
But while the 2011 floods are the worst in years, for many places they’re not the worst in that many years. The Big Muddy is topping its banks and barriers more frequently and with greater consequences than flood models tend to predict. There are several reasons for that depending on who you ask, but regardless of whether it’s global warming, bad flood modeling, or simple statistical anomaly, one thing is abundantly clear: the mighty Mississippi wants out of the path that humans have determined for it, and it is increasingly finding ways to escape.
The Army Corps of Engineers often speaks in terms of 100-year or 25-year floods (a somewhat confusing nomenclature that means a flood of a given magnitude has a 1-in-100 or a 1-in-25 chance of occurring in a certain year, respectively), but since 1993’s devastating Midwestern floods, some places in the region are seeing 10- and 25-year events several times in a single decade.
From an engineering and infrastructure standpoint, this is becoming a serious problem. Fighting back the waters is an ongoing fight–and if one were to judge from the Corps’ decision to blow some levees in Missouri earlier this month to relieve pressure upstream, it’s a fight that we aren’t necessarily winning.
“The river has a job to do,” says Robert Criss, a professor of Earth and planetary sciences at Washington University in St. Louis. “Its job is to move water and dirt to the Gulf of Mexico. It has adjusted its morphology in the most efficient way that it can to do that. But of course we think we know better, so we’ve changed that.”
Criss refers to the complex system of levees, dikes, spillways, and locks, that have been constructed along the length of the river to make it straighter, deeper, and more conducive to moving goods along its length. From a geoengineering standpoint, the Mississippi is a modern marvel, a massive case of humans bending nature to their will through clever engineering and lots of concrete. But the river is pushing back.
Take the lower Mississippi, right at the point where it hits the homestretch to the Gulf. The river wants to take a new path to the Gulf, one that is 150 miles shorter. Doing so becomes a more tempting proposition for the river with every passing year. As the river carries more and more sediment downriver to the Gulf, its path grows longer and longer, forcing it to deposit more sediment upstream to maintain sufficient force to make its way to the Gulf.
This puts additional stress on the river system, stress that would be relieved if the river turned west and down through the Atchafalaya River, which connects to the Mississippi some 45 miles north-northwest of Baton Rouge, and headed on out to sea. Holding it back is the Army Corps of Engineer’s Old River Control Structure (completed in 1963, it is indeed old). If the Old River Control Structure were to fail–and infrastructure does fail, as Americans learned the hard way when Katrina hit–the map of the Mississippi Delta would be redrawn in a matter of hours, with devastating consequences.
The Old River Control Structure
Last week the executive director of the Port of New Orleans said that closure of the Mississippi due to the most recent flooding would cost nearly $300 million per day. If the main thrust of the Mississippi took the Atchafalaya route and bypassed New Orleans to the west, the city would need a new livelihood and America would need a new port city and all the infrastructure and pipeline that comes with it. That’s not even counting the losses from the areas that would flood and become unusable through the Atchafalaya basin.
The results would be economically crippling, at least for several years. And the same argument can be made all along the entire 2,300-mile length of the river (and along every major waterway in America). So we instead must keep building, and occasionally making undesirable tradeoffs, like the one the Corps of Engineers was forced to make two weeks ago when it blew levees along the Mississippi to save the town of Cairo, Ill., flooding 130,000 acres of Missouri farmland and devastating entire agricultural communities instead.
“Do you keep building the levees, etc., etc., and spending all this money?” says Dr. Thomas Zimmie, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. “In most cases, you don’t have much choice. There are more than 100,000 miles of levees in the U.S.,” almost every one of them protecting some enclave of residential, agricultural, or commercial life.
Zimmie was part of the team of engineers that assessed New Orleans’ broken levees for Congress in the aftermath of Katrina, and he heard the criticisms bouncing around the national conversation after that storm saying New Orleans, a city below sea level, was a lost cause. But all sentiments aside, from an infrastructure point of view the rebuilding of the city–and its levees–was never in question. “You can’t abandon New Orleans,” he says. “It’s a major port.”
There’s no outright way to fix this push-pull between human development and the river, but Robert Criss, the scientist, thinks it’s possible to strike a kind of compromise.
“The levees are actually too high,” Criss says. “We need lower levees, particularly those with agricultural land behind them, and those lower levees need more gates on them.” The idea, he says, is to keep levees from overtopping, when the water tends to surge more like a dam break, scouring away topsoil and destroying farmland (and anything else in its path).
“Rather than having these levees catastrophically fail and having these tsunamis of high-energy, turbulent water scouring the farms, you crank the gates open, let the waters flow gently over the farmland,” he says. “You create wetlands for the year and those farmers can be compensated for floodwater storage the same way they are sometimes compensated for letting their land lie fallow.”
It’s a system of controlled flooding, and while it’s not a perfect compromise, it would mitigate catastrophic inundation and–in the worst cases–destruction of critical infrastructure. Zimmie likes the notion, but he’s less optimistic that such a system could be implemented.
“In theory I agree with that answer, but when you start looking into how to do it it’s not that easy,” he says. “When you start saying ‘okay, we’re going to flood this and not that,’ it’s not a real practical answer as far as I’m concerned. When you get into the nitty-gritty, it starts to get really tough.”
So the Army Corps of Engineers will keep building–and occasionally blasting–because what else can it do at this point? The river wants to change course, and we’re going to do our best to ensure that it doesn’t. Until, eventually, it does.
“The Atchafalaya distributary is going to eventually win, and the river is going to go that way,” Criss says. “Some flood will eventually undermine these structures. This is a geologic inevitability.”
High Walls Keep Out Flood
Lone House and Shed
Line of Trees
Floods Isolate Homes
Road Just Above Water
Small Pocket of Dry Land
Aid Workers In Sierra Leone
Photo was taken on August 2, 2014.
The havoc that Ebola is wreaking in West Africa cannot be understated. With a total of 21,200 people infected since March 2014, the disease is shredding the social fabric of Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia, leaving 8,400 dead. People live in fear, afraid to shake others’ hands. Survivors are shunned, and those suspected of carrying the disease are being physically assaulted in some regions. Schools are closed, and economies have been ravaged.
Yet the situation could have been much worse. Last fall, many scientists predicted that the epidemic would be raging out of control by now. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that, in the worst case scenario, a total of 1.4 million West Africans would be infected by mid-January. Other models from other teams predicted hundreds of thousands of Ebola cases by now too.
So far, these doomsday prophecies aren’t coming to fruition. The latest report from WHO suggests that the rate of new cases is slowing down, and although the deadliest Ebola epidemic in history is far from finished, the worst of it may be behind us. That’s great news! But why were the models so far off?
In Sierra Leone (left) and Liberia (right), the number of new Ebola cases is decreasing.Timing Is Everything
The CDC study, published in September, only included data up until the end of August. At that time, the epidemic was growing quickly, and very few governments and aid organizations seemed to be stepping up to help. Then there was a huge surge in aid starting in September, and the situation started to turn around quickly. Epidemiologists couldn’t have predicted which organizations would help, how much aid they would give, how that aid would be allocated, and what impact each measure would have on curbing the epidemic.
“The key part to remember is that we make projections based on the assumption that no further interventions and no further changes in human behavior will take place,” says Martin Meltzer, who led the CDC study. “We knew, or we very much hoped that we would be wrong.”
Scientists’ predictions of calamity weren’t unreasonable, says Colin Brown, who studies infectious diseases at King’s College London and works closely with hospitals in Sierra Leone. “The models showed what could happen if there was a lack of international effort. We really don’t know what would have happened if the world hadn’t stepped up.”Unreported Cases
A model by the World Health Organization (WHO) seems to be more accurate than the CDC’s, predicting Ebola cases would exceed 20,000 by the beginning of November. The real numbers were closer to 13,000 by then, and the model didn’t predict any numbers beyond that month.
The main difference between the CDC and WHO models lies in the estimation of how many Ebola cases weren’t included in the data. Epidemiologists know that not everyone who gets sick reports it to the proper authorities, but the WHO model didn’t attempt to estimate how many. The CDC model, by comparison, assumed that for every reported case, 1.5 other cases were not recorded. That assumption likely contributed to some of the overestimation.Humans Are Complicated
Similarly, Brown says, communities in Sierra Leone gradually began to accept that burials had to be done differently. They began going to clinics earlier for treatment and isolating themselves when they feared they’d contracted Ebola.“Sierra Leone used to be an incredibly tactile, physically warm culture. Now it’s almost an insult for someone to hold their hand out to shake it.”
“Sierra Leone used to be an incredibly tactile, physically warm culture,” says Brown. “Now it’s almost an insult for someone to hold their hand out to shake it. People have been quite quick to learn that this is a disease spread by close contact and bodily secretions…. The sad thing is you hope that things can go back to normal soon.”It’s Not Over Yet
While the number of new cases is slowing down, West Africa is not out of the woods yet.
“Definitely things are getting better,” says Meltzer. “However we have to be on guard, not lulled into complacency… There are still places within West Africa where Ebola is a very big threat, and it will spread out again if we let down our guard.”
That’s what happened last spring, when an apparent lull in Ebola cases suggested the epidemic was winding down. Weeks later, the virus reared back worse than ever. Some experts think the “lull” was just a result of people not reporting their illness as panic grew. Others suggest that health authorities let down their guard. In any case, it’s clear that public health authorities will have to remain vigilant in tracking down cases.
Meltzer says the epidemic can be quelled if health authorities continue to do what they’re doing now. “There’s no magic pill. We have to spend more time and effort tracing contacts, making sure they go to Ebola Treatment Units or situations with reduced risk, and continue the message of safe burials.”
Once the epidemic has been quelled, Brown predicts that West Africa will continue to see lots of smaller, localized outbreaks for many months to come, because of the interconnectedness between cultures. These will likely pop up in places that haven’t seen a case in weeks or months, as people revert back to traditional burial customs. To stop these situations from growing worse, Brown says health authorities need to be quick. “We’re going to have to have rapid-response SWAT teams that are ready to dive into the population to trace contacts and get people into care very quickly,” says Brown.
Other challenges will continue to plague doctors and nurses long after this particular epidemic ends. Animals, including bats, carry Ebola and sometimes reintroduce the disease back into human populations in Africa. “When people show up with a fever, how do you know it’s not malaria?” Brown asks. “What early warning mechanisms are going to be in place to get it under control?”
Dogecoin (DOGE) was created as a fun, light-hearted cryptocurrency that generated much interest and profitability. However, is Dogecoin the best investment option, or are there other cryptocurrencies that may be more profitable? We will explore RoboApe (RBA) and compare its profitability to that of Dogecoin.RoboApe (RBA) Wants to Change the Experience of Meme Coins.
In the crypto market, RoboApe (RBA), which has joined the meme coin trend that we have come across many times recently, manages to stand out from its competitors and attract attention.
Although most projects developed in this area do not have a solid roadmap, RoboApe (RBA) makes a big difference in this regard. The RBA project, which has a solid financial strategy and is developed with a community focus, manages to attract the attention of many investors with its potential.
RoboApe (RBA) plans to expand its user base with an aggressive marketing strategy. RBA, which intends to promote collaborations in esports, plans to gain recognition with various souvenirs of the brand while doing this.
RoboApe (RBA) has a deflationary policy. In line with this policy, RBA, which burns tokens in every transaction, it aims to increase the token value in the long run. Investors show serious interest in the RBA token pre-sale process, thanks to the stable planning offered by the project.Dogecoin (DOGE): The Original Meme Coin
The most prominent feature that distinguishes the Dogecoin (DOGE) project from other cryptocurrencies is that it does not have a deflationary structure. On the contrary, the project, which has an inflationary system, has no supply restrictions. The project, which sets out that it will not be a profitable business when the assets with limited supply are mined and when the supply is reached, aims to always make a profit by providing unlimited supply.
Dogecoin (DOGE) mining is done by confirming transactions on the project’s blockchain and receiving rewards in return. Because these transactions have strong mathematical problems, people who want to mine for Dogecoin (DOGE) must have highly efficient systems. The mining of the project differs in some respects from other cryptocurrencies. Block times, algorithm, difficulty level, and reward amounts are the first noticeable differences.Ethereum (ETH): The Original Pre-Sale Success Story.
If we are talking about successful pre-sale coins, we also have to mention Ethereum (ETH). Ethereum (ETH) uses Ether as its power source. Its purpose is to enable users to create new software on the blockchain it is connected to. Thanks to this freedom provided by Ethereum (ETH), thousands of altcoins have been created today. In Ethereum, it is desired to prevent the storage of various information by third parties.
Today, in all transactions using the internet, data is stored by third parties. It is unknown for what purpose and by whom this stored information is used. Ethereum (ETH) technology prevents this and ensures that transactions are untraceable and data cannot be stored. This way, it aims to ensure the security of users who perform financial transactions on the internet. Although Ethereum (ETH)’s pre-sale prices were meager, the point it has come to over the years is obvious. The fact that it is currently the second most valuable cryptocurrency is one of the most significant proofs of how profitable investments pre-sales can be.
RoboApe (RBA) is a new digital currency that has the potential to be very profitable. Its algorithm and blockchain technology are very sound, and it seems to have a good community behind it. If you’re looking for a new digital currency to invest in, RoboApe (RBA) may be a good option.ROBOAPE
Join Presale: presale.roboape.io/register
Update the detailed information about Why Retina Display Is More Than Twice As Responsive As The Competition on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!