You are reading the article Why Is Google Going Backwards With Project Tango Tablets? updated in February 2024 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Why Is Google Going Backwards With Project Tango Tablets?
Why is Google going backwards with Project Tango tablets?
Google’s Project Tango is set to spawn a new device, so the leaks would have it, with the company tipped to be readying 4,000 prototype 3D scanning tablets just in time for Google I/O late in June. Whether they’ll be I/O giveaways or something else is unclear at this stage, though the goal is believed to be furnishing developers ahead of a broader launch. What’s interesting, however, is that Google already had a Project Tango tablet: in fact, it replaced it with the current developer device.
The current Project Tango device – and the one Google revealed the R&D with back in February – is a 5-inch smartphone which Google specially commissioned for its scanning purposes.
As Johnny Lee, technical program lead at Google’s Advanced Technology and Projects Group responsible for Project Tango explained to me in March, there’s a whole lot of unusual technology packed into that Android handset. On the front, there’s a wide field-of-view camera, while on the back there’s a high-speed, 4-megapixel RGB-IR camera, a motion-tracking camera, and a depth-sensing camera.
Inside, meanwhile, two separate vision processors do the heavy lifting, allowing the phone to mimic how the human eye works. A detailed central section is surrounded by a broader – but less detailed – area of peripheral vision. Used in combination, they can build up a 3D model of a room or other area, with photographic detail layered on top.
Google Project Tango hands-on:
The phone, however, was actually the second prototype that the ATAP team produced. The first, Lee told me, was a 7-inch Android tablet made in late Q2 2013. That had the same sort of sensors as the smartphone, but a far more rudimentary shell: effectively two sheets of transparent plastic between which the various boards, sensors, and other components were sandwiched.
Google has already been trialling the Project Tango phone with third-party developers – one firm, Matterport, contrasted it favorably with its own, far more expensive 3D mapping system – but devices have been limited in number. Lee told me only around 200 were produced, unsurprisingly leading to a bottleneck in availability.
This next batch of 4,000 would seem to address that, but it’s unclear why Google would go back a step to the 7-inch form-factor, rather than sticking with the slightly-chubby but still pocketable phone.
A possibility is cost. Lee wouldn’t say how much Google paid for each device, referring only to the overall technology as being intended for consumers not niche professionals, but the expense of creating a special run of phones that squeeze in unusual sensors is likely to be high. Google might be able to save money by going bigger, potentially allowing for larger, cheaper components to be used, or generally avoiding some of the expense of miniaturization.
Another explanation could be battery life. The current phone uses tricks like cycling the depth sensor on and off, Lee said, so as to cut power consumption and processor load, but 3D scanning is still an intensive activity.
Opting for something more akin to a Nexus 7 in size would allow Google to fit in a considerably larger battery.
Finally, there’s the prospect of the “killer app”, something Lee conceded that Google was still figuring out for Project Tango overall. The ATAP team had settled on games to most easily demonstrate what the smartphone could do, cooking up a few simple titles that showed how a virtual character could interact with the physical surroundings.
That, along with mapping applications, simply may work better and be more effective for users on a larger screen.
Whatever the reasoning, there won’t be long to wait. Google is believed to be readying its Project Tango tablets for June, which tallies neatly with I/O. SlashGear will be there to bring back all the news.
You're reading Why Is Google Going Backwards With Project Tango Tablets?
Why would you want a Google Project Tango tablet?
Google’s Project Tango is gradually graduating from lab to the real world, with Google’s ATAP team responsible for the 3D mapping technology partnering with NVIDIA for a new developer tablet. Thing is, $1,024 is a whole lot to spend, even for a developer device that can see the world in unprecedented detail. So, why exactly would you need a Project Tango tablet?
If you’re unfamiliar with the concept, Project Tango is both complicated and straightforward. The goal is the simple part: build up detailed 3D models of areas, both how they present to the human eye and their dimensions, which can then be interacted with and manipulated.
How Tango hardware does that is the complex part. Project Tango devices – this new Tegra-powered tablet is actually the third generation, following a rudimentary tablet first and then a smartphone form-factor after that – are bristling with cameras and depth sensors.
On the back, for instance, there’s a high-pixel-size regular camera for detail, and a wide-angle, lower resolution camera: together, they mimic the effect of an eye, with a narrow, detailed center portion and then a broader, vaguer surrounding area. There’s also a depth sensor, so that the tablet knows whereabouts the walls and other objects are.
So, you’ve mapped your home, or your office, or the park around the corner – what next?
To be blunt, in part Google doesn’t really know. One of the reasons it’s making Project Tango hardware more generally available is to see exactly what developers can come up with. So far, a portion of the roughly 200 smartphone-scale prototypes – functionally identical to the tablet, but with smaller batteries and displays – have been out with developers, but the arrival of the tablet should exponentially increase that.
That could unlock things like citizen mapping, where expensive camera-toting cars from Google or Nokia are replaced – or, more likely, supplemented – by individual users carrying tablets. The door is then opened for high-resolution Street View style maps, but of places the big companies might never actually find their way to covering, or with detail updates far more frequently than they have the manpower to carry out now.
Phones have been able to do 360 panoramas before, but what elevates Project Tango is the detail involved. Users could walk around a store and have product names read out to them, or around an unfamiliar city and have a detailed understanding of where they were, even if they were visually-impaired.
Creating your own personal maps of your living space might make picking new furnishings less of a risk, whether that’s in a physical store or online. Not only would you be sure they’d fit spatially, you could see – in three-dimensions – how they’d actually look with your existing color scheme and furniture.
Then, of course, there’s gaming. Perhaps the most obvious application, we’ve already seen in basic demos from Google’s own team: showing virtual characters on-screen that can interact with the topology of the room around you. There’s also the possibility of virtual treasure hunts – the digital update to geocaching, perhaps – or even real-world MMOs like Ingress, Google’s mass multiplayer game currently designed for phones.
In the end, that $1k price tag isn’t something consumers will face. Google’s aim is to find the killer apps for Project Tango technology, to persuade device manufacturers to integrate the sort of post-compass sensors that allow tomorrow’s smartphones and tablets to know not only where they are and what they’re looking at. Expect to hear more on that at Google I/O later this month.
The top 10 reasons why Python programming language will not disappear and will rule
One of the languages that are experiencing phenomenal development and popularity each year is Python. Python has become the world’s fastest-growing programming language, and Stackoverflow predicted in 2023 that it would surpass all the other programming languages. Python will not disappear any sooner than a few of them have expected.
It is also regarded as one of the top programming languages for artificial intelligence. The following article will outline the different reasons why Python will not disappear. Python programming language also has been universally adopted in every sector. Python’s popularity has led to the availability of more fresh libraries and tools, and as we have seen with machine learning, the most cutting-edge technology is more likely to be created in the hottest language. Here we discuss the top reasons why Python won’t disappear and due to the frequent requirement for programmers to find quick solutions, languages like Python were developed.Here are the top 10 reasons why Python will not disappear– 1.Simple to Use and Learn
The Python programming language is relatively simple for new users to learn and utilize. Python is one of the most user-friendly programming languages since it has a simple syntax and isn’t overly complex, putting more of an emphasis on natural language. Python is one of the easiest programming languages to learn and use, making it possible to write and execute scripts quickly compared to other programming languages.2.Mature and Encouraging Community for Python 3.Support from Renowned Corporate Sponsors 4.Numerous Python Frameworks and Libraries
Python includes fantastic libraries that you may use to pick and save your time and work on the initial cycle of development thanks to its corporate backing and large supportive community. Additionally, a large number of cloud media services provide cross-platform support via library-like tools, which can be quite helpful.5.Flexibility, Effectiveness, Dependability, and Quickness
Any developer who uses Python will concur that it is more effective, dependable, and quick than the majority of contemporary languages. Regardless of the platform one is working on, Python can be used in almost any situation without experiencing any performance degradation.6.Cloud Computing, Machine Learning, and Big Data
The three biggest topics in computer science today—Cloud Computing, Machine Learning, and Big Data—help many firms adapt and enhance their processes and workflows.7.A Top Choice Language
Because of python’s great demand in the development business, it is the language of choice for many programmers and students. A language that is in high demand is always something that students and developers look forward to studying. Without a question, Python is the current market’s hottest product.8.Python’s Flexibility as a Language
The flexibility of the Python language allows developers to experiment with novel ideas. An expert in the Python programming language is not only able to create similar objects but may also attempt to create things anew.9.Python’s Use in Academics
Python is now regarded as the primary programming language in schools and colleges because of all the applications it has in fields like artificial intelligence, deep learning, data science, etc. Schools and universities cannot afford to stop teaching Python since it has now integrated so deeply into the development community.
By attracting more Python programmers and developers, it is accelerating the language’s development and expansion.10.Automation
The availability of several tools and modules in the Python programming language makes the automation of activities much easier. It is astounding to learn that with only the essential Python programs, one may easily achieve a high level of automation.
Advanced Micro Devices hopes to brush off a slow start to compete against ARM and Intel in the Windows 8 tablet market through new customer announcements and future chips.
The company will announce between six to 10 tablets for its Z-60 tablet chip, which is code-named Hondo and was announced earlier this month, said John Taylor, director of marketing at AMD. The new tablets will be announced by January next year, around the time of the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, where some of the top electronics makers show off their latest wares.
Currently only one tablet, Fujitsu’s Stylistic Q572, has been introduced with the dual-core Z-60 chip. The Windows 8 tablet has a 10-inch screen, two cameras, a removable battery and weighs 748 grams, which is heavier than many of the Windows 8 tablets, which weigh between 500 grams and 700 grams. The tablet’s price is 90,800 yen (US$1,136), and will become available at the end of November.
AMD is also looking forward to the new tablet chips, Kabini and Tamesh, which will have between two and four CPU cores and next-generation graphics cores. The new chips will be released next year and bring better performance and battery life to tablets. Earlier this year the company ripped up its old chip roadmap and introduced a new strategy for tablet, server and PC chips. Hondo is based on the company’s old chip roadmap, but the newer tablet chips next year will have the faster and more power-efficient Jaguar CPU core, which is part of the new chip roadmap.
AMD has made the tablet market one of its top priorities as it tries to move away from a heavy reliance on the slumping PC business. AMD last year introduced the Z-01 tablet chip, which failed. The lack of a tablet strategy was one of the reasons former AMD CEO Dirk Meyer resigned in early 2011.
Former Lenovo exec Rory Read was appointed AMD’s CEO in August last year, and the company has put together a new management team and chip roadmap. But AMD continues to struggle, with the company last week announcing that it would lay off 1,800 employees as part of a restructuring plan. The company also recorded revenue decline in the most recent fiscal quarter on a challenging economy and weak demand for its products.
AMD has to face off with both ARM and Intel as it tries to get in the tablet market, said Dean McCarron, principal analyst at Mercury Research. Microsoft is unveiling Windows 8 for x86 chips, which provides an avenue for AMD to compete, McCarron said. Microsoft is providing Windows RT for ARM processors.
The tablet market has evolved around ARM, and the x86 chips from companies like Intel and AMD have been much slower on adoption. The iPad and other Android tablets run on ARM processors, and Microsoft has already announced the $499 Surface RT tablet, which is based on a quad-core Tegra 3 chip from Nvidia.
But even in the x86 market, AMD is trailing Intel. Top PC makers like Lenovo, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Samsung, Acer and Asus have announced Windows 8 tablets with Intel’s tablet-specific Atom chip code-named Clover Trail. Intel has said it is tracking more than 20 design wins, so more tablets with Clover Trail chips are expected to be released in the near future.
The feature set AMD is offering on Hondo—which is a repurposed netbook chip—is adequate for tablets, but questions remain on how competitive the company can be in the tablet market, McCarron . Even a small design win can be adequate for AMD, but it is not comparable to the progress ARM has made via products such as the iPad, McCarron said.
This article was updated on October 25 to correct a reportorial error on the number of tablets AMD will announce by January 2013.
We learned today about Apple’s satellite project: a team working on ways to establish direct two-way connections between iPhones and satellites.
If that sounds like crazy science-fiction, it’s actually not. The technology to do it exists today and has been proven to work with today’s phones. You shouldn’t, however, expect to have ubiquitous access from anywhere on the planet, nor for satellite connections to replace your existing mobile data plan.
The technology has significant limitations…
A company called Lynk (originally Ubiquitilink) proved the tech works by creating what it called ‘the first cell tower in space.’ It created a prototype satellite that was assembled on the International Space Station and subsequently attached to the nose of the Cygnus resupply spacecraft for a live test back in February. It worked, as TechCrunch reported at the time.
The theory became a reality earlier this year after Ubiquitilink launched their prototype satellites. They successfully made a two-way 2G connection between an ordinary ground device and the satellite, proving that the signal not only gets there and back, but that its Doppler and delay distortions can be rectified on the fly.
“Our first tests demonstrated that we offset the Doppler shift and time delay. Everything else is leveraging commercial software,” Miller said, though he quickly added: “To be clear, there’s plenty more work to be done, but it isn’t anything that’s new technology. It’s good solid hardcore engineering, building nanosats and that sort of thing.”
If it sounds incredible that one of today’s iPhones can transmit into space, especially when there are still mobile dead-spots around on ordinary mobile networks, Lynk says it’s really not. Remove ground obstacles from the equation by beaming directly to and from space, and stick to low-frequency signals, and they can travel a long way.
“That’s the great thing — everybody’s instinct indicates [that it’s impossible],” said Ubiquitilink founder Charles Miller. “But if you look at the fundamentals of the RF [radio frequency] link, it’s easier than you think.”
The issue, he explained, isn’t really that the phone lacks power. The limits of reception and wireless networks are defined much more by architecture and geology than plain physics. When an RF transmitter, even a small one, has a clear shot straight up, it can travel very far indeed.
There are, however, some important caveats that would apply to Apple’s satellite project.
First, you can’t communicate with satellites in geosynchronous orbit – that’s simply too high. The maximum range is around 300 miles, which is extremely low in satellite terms. At that height, satellites can’t remain in orbit at one fixed point above the Earth: they need to orbit much faster than the Earth’s rotation, which means coverage from any one satellite won’t last long.
You’ll have no signal for 55 minutes, then signal for five.
So you’d need at least a thousand satellites to ensure there will always be at least one within range. That would be a massive undertaking, even for Apple.
Second, low-frequency signals mean low bandwidth. What Lynk has demonstrated so far is 2G communication, meaning that it’s suitable for things like text messages but not much more than that. The company does talk grandly about 3G, LTE, and 5G being subsequent stages, but that’s all just talk so far – and it’s hard to see how those kinds of speeds could be achieved over that kind of range through the atmosphere.
Third, it’s unlikely that Apple will sell you a data plan based on low-Earth satellite connections. This is tech which is most likely to be sold through existing mobile carriers as an additional roaming option in areas of the planet that are not served by conventional base stations.
If you want to understand more about how the tech works, the full TechCrunch piece is worth reading, and Lynk has links to other coverage on its website.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Google Chrome is Not Compatible With This iPad [Fix]
Getting stuck on installing Google Chrome on your iPad gadget? Don’t stress, we have answers.
An efficient resolution may be to update your iOS system to a more recent version.
Cleaning up your memory is always healthy for your device, so erase unused data regularly.
It may be the case to get another iPad version if nothing seems to fix this Chrome issue.
Try Opera One, a browser with various functionalities already built-in!
A flawless browser like Opera has most functions already under the hood.
Here’s what’s included by default:
Easy and intuitive workspace management
Ad-blocker mode integrated to load pages faster
WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger
Customizable Ul and AI-friendly
⇒ Get Opera One
Browsing the Internet has become second nature for most of us and we currently live in a period where it has become synonymous with pretty much everything we do.
Not only do we use it for shopping, or catching up with our friends and relatives, but it has also become a valuable work utensil.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic started and hybrid work became the new normal, browsers and communication software have turned into new links between us and our fellow colleagues.
Consequently, out of all the popular browser choices we have out there, the big majority of users have decided to go with Google’s Chrome.
As a result, you don’t necessarily need to be running a Microsoft-powered operating system in order to be able to use Chrome, as the software works fine on others as well.
That being said, if you are trying to install Chrome on your iPad and you can’t, for some reason, you came to the right place to get that fixed.Why won’t Chrome install on my iPad?
This can happen for a number of reasons, and we’re about to spill the beans. First of all, you should know that Chrome won’t be compatible with your iPad if your software is outdated.
The Google Chrome App has a minimum system requirement of iOS/iPadOS of 14.0 or later. As such, unless your iPad has iPadOS14 or later installed, you’ll not be able to install Chrome.
More so, you could also run low on space, which is another fact that could impede you from completing the installation.
In addition, a notable method to use if you want to bypass the Chrome incompatibility with your iPad is to change your current browser.
📌 Quick Tip:
As a suggestion, Opera One can bring valuable features to the table and quickly install them on your device. You get better privacy and faster navigation, plus trustful security with VPN support and a tracking ad blocker.
Forget about installation issues and have this faster and highly customized browser.
Free Visit websiteHow do I install Google Chrome on my iPad?
Note that whether or not you are able to update any iPad to a newer version of iOS/iPadOS will be dictated by the iPad model itself, as well as the currently installed version of iOS.
So, if you want to check your software version, all you have to do is
Access Settings on your iPad.
Tap the About button.
Hence, in order to update the software on your iPad to the required version for running Chrome, here’s what you have to do:
Access Settings on your iPad.
Tap the Software Update button.
Here, you will see if any software updates are available and also install them, provided your device is compatible with the latest release.2. Clear some space on your iPad
That being said, if you still need more space after you use the recommended actions, go ahead and delete apps and content that you don’t need.3. Consider getting a newer version of iPad
As we mentioned above, Chrome needs iOS/iPadOS of 14.0 or later in order to work on your iPad. With that in mind, know that some models are never going to receive this software version.
For example, the following list contains the devices that can run iOS 14.0. However, if the Apple gadget you have is not on the list, you won’t be able to install the OS version or Chrome:
iPhone 6s & 6s Plus
iPhone SE (2024)
iPhone 7 & 7 Plus
iPhone 8 & 8 Plus
iPhone XS & XS Max
iPhone 11 Pro & 11 Pro Max
iPhone SE (2024)
iPhone 12, 12 Max, 12 Pro, and 12 Pro Max
This is what you have to do if Chrome is not working on your iPad. Hopefully, after going through our article you will be able to solve this annoying problem.
Was this page helpful?
Update the detailed information about Why Is Google Going Backwards With Project Tango Tablets? on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!