You are reading the article In Motorola’s Moto G Phone, Apple’s Iphone 4S Has More Than Met Its Match updated in February 2024 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 In Motorola’s Moto G Phone, Apple’s Iphone 4S Has More Than Met Its Match
Apple has a problem. It’s not a problem that pertains to its high-end iPhone 5s, and it’s not even a problem with the mid-range, somewhat superfluous iPhone 5c. It’s actually the iPhone 4S that is an issue for Apple. Sitting at the bottom of the company’s smartphone range and being offered for peanuts if not free, the iPhone 4S was previously thought of as a rather capable budget handset. And it still is.
The problem that Apple now faces is that all those cheap Android phones that we’ve all laughed at over the years are starting to get a bit big for their shoes. In fact, some are downright great handsets, with one in particular doing its best to shake up the way we think about smartphones and what we should be paying for them.
I am, of course, talking about the Motorola Moto G…
Now as some of you reading this may know, I’m not in the United States, but rather the UK. England to be precise, and we’ve had the Moto G for a little while already. We’ve been waxing lyrical about its prowess and buying them in droves for weeks. But the Moto G is a relatively new phenomenon to most of you keeping abreast of technology news from over the pond, so let me explain why it’s so interesting. Especially to someone who’s a self confessed iPhone fan. I’ve tried Android and come back to iOS on plenty of occasions, and I’ve written about that plenty. Even so, this Moto G thing can’t be ignored by anyone, especially Apple.
So yes, obviously the Moto G is Android-powered. It’s got a big 4.5-inch screen that houses pixels of the 720×1280 resolution variety. That’s a higher-than-retina density of 329ppi for those who like that kind of thing.
It’s fast too. 1GB of RAM and a CPU that clocks in at 1.2GHz fast. The camera could be better, but at 5-megapixel it’ll still take photos that won’t have you throwing the damn thing out the window, that’s for sure.
The Moto G is getting stellar reviews across the internet too, and I know half a dozen people that have either picked one up already, or are in the process of doing so.
Oh, and it’s $179. Unlocked, without a contract. And if you shop around, it can be found for less, too. On-contract, it’s free.
So, that’s the budget Android handset of choice at the moment. What about iOS?
Well, we’ve a two-year old iPhone 4S. It’s smaller, with a 3.5-inch screen. A similar density of 326ppi gets you the original Retina display, and a resolution of 640×960.
The thing’s powered by a two year old Apple A5 chip that runs at 800MHz and that’s backed up by 500MB of RAM. Oh, and it may or may not be worth mentioning that that lower-clocked A5 has half as many cores as the chip in the Moto G. Still, until the iPhone 5s Apple didn’t really seem to care about the specs race anyway.
But this is where the problems begin to creep in for Apple and its aging iPhone 4S. Post-iOS 7, the budget iPhone can’t boast such performance. Swiping is laggy, tapping things doesn’t always mean something happens, and we’re starting to see games that really want an iPhone 5 or above in order to work as the developer intends. That’ll be that fragmentation we always like to accuse Android of, then.
So, as I amble towards the point I set out to make when I sat down to write this, I can’t help but wonder why Apple didn’t do the decent thing and make the iPhone 5 the new budget option for those of an iOS persuasion.
The answer, of course, is that iPhone 5c. Apple wanted a three-tiered approach to its iPhone sales, and it couldn’t expect people to pay a premium for the iPhone 5c over the iPhone 5 when the only difference was going to be some colored plastic shells. In fact, some would argue that the iPhone 5 is the more premium-looking device, which would have caused all kinds of problems with branding.
Instead, we’re left with the iPhone 5 being end-of-lifed, and the iPhone 4S given a stay of execution. Which was fine, until someone at Motorola decided to show us all what budget phones can do. Before the Moto G was conceived, and before the iPhone 4S became a liability for a company that just isn’t willing to let it go.
You're reading In Motorola’s Moto G Phone, Apple’s Iphone 4S Has More Than Met Its Match
Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Full Specs
[table id=288 /]Motorola Moto G Turbo Unboxing, Quick Review [Video] What is Usage Review, Tests and Opinion?
This review is based on our quick tests and usage done with the phone, we try to push the device to its limits and find out the results which will matter if you plan to buy this phone. We hope this review helps you to get your queries answered about the device.Box Contents
The box includes Handset, Turbo Charger, Earphone, User Manual and Warranty Card.Performance App Launch Speed
We launched multiple apps in the background including some web pages, heavy games, and few apps. The launch speed was hardly affected even after launching so many apps, we noticed a minor lag in some cases but it was expected at some point.Multitasking and RAM Management Scrolling Speed
We went through a lot of news articles, Facebook feeds, heavy webpages with a lot of media content including HD images and videos. The response was good even after 3-4 days of regular usage.Heating Benchmark Scores
[table id=286 /]
The Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition comes with a 13 MP rear camera with CCT flash and autofocus, and a 5 MP front camera. Mostly all its competitors have the same camera configuration around this price range. It performs well in almost all the conditions except low-light conditions, and the autofocus speed is quick but it is not very accurate. Shutter speed is fast and pictures in natural light look very natural.Camera UI
The camera UI is very basic and has almost no toggles on the viewfinder, except only the front and rear camera toggle and video recorder icon. Swiping from the left of the screen brings in the modes and other settings of the camera. Overall a good camera interface, only the tap to capture feature is a bit irritating some times.Day Light Photo Quality
In day light, both the cameras perform well. The colour production and colour accuracy was very impressive, and details were also nicely captured. Overall, it sports an considerable camera that can capture some good images in bright conditions.Low Light Photo Quality Selfie Quality
Selfies were also good but not the best we have seen so far, there are some much better front camera modules in the same range. Only the natural light selfies look bright and natural, otherwise the camera captures ordinary selfies.Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Camera Samples Video Quality
It can record video up to [email protected] and Slow motion videos too. The video recording in the phone is good, and the slow motion was something that was most impressive. Videos were sharp, clear and bright. If we consider the price, the video quality is among the top ranked phones of this range.Battery Performance Charging Time
The phone took less than 40 minutes to get to a full charge for us and even with notifications buzzing on the phone, the battery level has not dropped below 60 per cent. Based on our early impressions, we would say the battery on this phone is pretty reliable and will last you more than a day with moderate to heavy usage.Screen on Time
We recorded around 4-4.5 hours of screen on time during our usage.Battery Drop Rate And Heating
Looks and Design
The Canvas 5 again falls apart if compared to the competitors. Where most of the phones are having premium cases, Motorola sticks to a sturdy one. It looks the same as we saw in Moto G 3rd Generation. But Motorola again puts the right move forward by making it IP67 certified, which obviously makes it Water resistant up to 1 meter and 30 minutes and dust resistant as well.Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Photo Gallery Quality of material
The front of the device uses glass coating where the back cover is made up of rubber finished plastic with a grippy finish. The sides are made up of alloy which feels really solid and sturdy.Ergonomics
With a 5 inch display, the Moto G Turbo weighs 155 grams and measure 142.1 x 72.4 x 11.6 mm. The dimensions of the phone are great and single handed usage is very easy. The weight is a little more than the phones which come with this screen size but it is again expected from a phone with such strength.Display Clarity, Colors & Viewing Angles Outdoor Visibility (Max brightness)
Visibility in outdoors is good, and adaptive brightness works pretty nicely and changes very smoothly with changing light conditions.Custom User Interface
Like always, Motorola has used the same basic Android scheme on this device as well. Stock Android lovers will like the interface as usability is never an issue on such devices.Sound Quality
The sound quality from the speaker is loud and clear. The placement of speaker is on the front of the phone which can be seen in all the Moto devices.Call Quality
Call quality was fine, we did not face any issues at any point of time.Gaming Performance Game Lag & Heating
While in the gameplay, we didn’t find a point to complain. We did not notice lags in the beginning of the game but when we continued gaming for 30 minutes without a pause, the game started to slow down at few places. These lags didn’t create any problem in the game, and the heating was also very normal. Playing games while charging may cause unusual heating in some cases as it.Conclusion
Moto G LTE from last year just received a semi-working Android 6.0 ROM, that introduces the Marshmallow update to the device. Take not that we’re not talking this year’s Moto G, the 3rd Gen, it’s for last year’s Moto G LTE edition, codenamed Titan.
Because it’s Marshmallow update you’re getting here, the ROM is a cool deal, but it could still be away from becoming your daily driver as some things aren’t working as they should, and they are things you won’t be too keen on losing in the first place. See the bugs list below.
But anyway, now that first build is out, which already got calls and messages working, the situation is pretty brighter than Marshmallow update for Moto E 2024 via CM13.
We’ve seen initial builds like this before, and that’s why we think the major issues will be ironed out pretty soon. So, you really have a good deal here, the CM13 should be your ticket to an unofficial Marshmallow update till Motorola rolls out an official one, which we will be covering too, but it will only happen a month or two later at best.
For now, if you want Marshmallow on your Moto G 2nd Gen LTE, CyanogenMod 13 remains your best bet.
RIL [mobile data (no 4G though), calls, messages]
Not working as of now
Selecting an other language than english will cause a bootloop
Stock browser can’t download files
Stock file manager doesn’t work
The ROM is in alpha stage of development right now, and well, is not a daily driver at all. Far from it, actually.
Here’s why: first up, network isn’t working at all, meaning no calls, no sms, nothing. Next, Dual-SIM functionality is lost too. And there are other you could find below.
For what it’s worth, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, seem to be working, along with camera, audio, video, etc.
→ Check out this page for latest on what’s working, and what’s not.
Google Apps (Marshmallow Gapps) — Link
Motorola Moto G LTE, codename Titan
Don’t try this on any other device than the one having model no. specified above.
Use the Droid Info app, to determine the codename of your Moto G LTE. If it is exactly the one specified above, then it should be compatible with the 6.0 custom ROM we have here.
Warranty may be void of your device if you follow the procedures given on this page. You only are responsible for your device. We won’t be liable if any damage occurs to your device and/or its components.
Backup important files stored on your device before proceeding with the steps below, so that in case something goes wrong you’ll have backup of all your important files.
How to Install
Required: You will need to have TWRP recovery installed on your device to be able to install Marshmallow custom ROM and Google Apps (Gapps). Check out our page on Moto G LTE TWRP recovery for this.
Step 1. Download the Marshmallow ROM and gapps file from above.
Step 2. Connect your device to PC and transfer the ROM and gapps file to it. Disconnect the device then. Remember the location of the files.
Step 3. Boot your Moto G LTE into recovery mode. If you are rooted, you can use Quick Boot app from play store. To manually boot into recovery mode, do this:
Power off your device and wait for 5-10 seconds until the device is fully switched off.
Press and hold Volume down + Power button together and release them after 3-4 seconds. You’ll enter bootloader mode.
Now, use volume up/down repeatedly until Recovery option shows up, and then use Power button to select it and enter recovery mode.
You will enter recovery mode soon, and should see TWRP recovery. If you see an Android with an exclamation mark, then you need to install TWRP recovery for this (linked above).
Step 4. [Optional] Once in TWRP, create a backup of your device. Tap on Backup, and then select all the partitions for back. Now do the swipe action at bottom to start creating a backup for emergency cases. This backup is really a lifesaver!
Step 6. Now, install the ROM file. On TWRP’s homescreen, tap on Install, and then locate the ROM file and tap on it. Then do the Swipe action at bottom to begin flashing the update.
Step 7. Tap on Home button to go back. Now, install the Gapps the same way you installed Marshmallow ROM on your Moto G LTE.
Step 8. When it’s done, tap on Reboot system button to restart the device.
BTW, if you face force closes on apps, or Google Play services error, then install the ROM as said above again, but do not flash Gapps for now.
The third quarter of the year was both exciting and nerve-wracking for most in the crypto-community. And, while both Bitcoin and Ethereum saw positive quarters, the big winners were actually newer protocols. In fact, a significant surge in smart contract platforms outpacing the larger market was noticeable with the rise of projects such as Solana, Avalanche, and Terra. All of the aforementioned gained by at least 300% on the charts.
Even though the Ethereum network had a burst of new user adoption, mostly due to the rapid rise of NFTs, it also suffered from record high transaction fees throughout the year. This, including a total of $1.96 billion in fees in Q3 alone.
This benefited competitive smart contract platforms and so-called ‘Ethereum-killers’ like Solana and Avalanche as users searched for low-fee alternatives to Ethereum.
With SOL’s price and ETH’s mean transaction fee seeing coinciding tops, speculations of SOL’s rally being driven by Ethereum were in place. So, was this all there was to SOL’s growth?More organic than it seems
The August-September rally was called “Solana Summer” by many in the market as the price of the alt hit $200 per token. This, from a modest $2 at the beginning of the year. However, soon after, the asset saw considerable consolidation following its ATH of $215 as pessimism took over. This only fueled speculations of SOL’s rally being precipitated by ETH.
Solana’s rally, however, was much more organic than it seemed. Notably, Solana’s DeFi projects crossed over $3 billion in September this year. The sheer rise in the number of projects for SOL proved that it is capable of giving tough competition to ETH and other ETH-killers.
Solana also used the explosion of NFTs to drive its growth as an interoperable blockchain platform. In fact, NFTs on SOL hit a $1 billion market cap on 2 October.
Additionally, while SOL’s spot market saw low trade volumes and lower price anticipation, the Futures market presented a brighter outlook. The Open Interest for the altcoin saw an uptick over the last couple of days, one indicating a rise in the number of outstanding contracts held by market participants.
The same also underlined the fact that new capital has been flowing into the coin’s markets.Getting risky, but hanging in there
Solana’s market has been rather unresponsive of late, but over a higher timeframe, the altcoin clung on to the higher $164 resistance. Further, positive news like Ubeswap announcing a collaboration with Allbridge to bring both Solana’s native asset ‘SOL’ and Saber’s governance token ‘SBR’ to Celo gave the alt the necessary social pump. Irrespective of the contained prices.
However, at press time, SOL’s Sharpe ratio had entered the negative territory, reaching July levels while volatility also saw a dip. The fall in the alt’s Sharpe ratio seemed indicative of the fact that SOL’s performance had gotten riskier when compared to a “risk-free” asset over a window of time.
Even though a price pump could reverse this damage at the time of writing, it seems unlikely that SOL would have a sustained rally in the near future.
Nevertheless, Solana’s growth has been too big to ignore. What’s more, the seventh-ranked crypto has held its rank on the charts, despite its consolidating prices. While daily and weekly gains of “just” 2.89% and 10.10%, respectively, it could make a stronger comeback when altcoins really rally.
2024 Hyundai Santa Fe Review: Affordable SUV more than matches its 7 passenger peers
There’s no way to avoid it: every mainstream car company needs a three-row SUV in its line-up to be taken seriously these days. We’re long past the first-generation efforts of automakers unsure of how best to tackle the extended family demographic, which means if you’re going to seat seven or more in 2023, then you’re going to have to do better than merely go through the motions. More to the point, you’re going to have to beat rivals like the Hyundai Santa Fe.
The 2023 Hyundai Santa Fe is the latest version of an SUV one-two punch that first debuted for the 2013 model year. Positioned as the more capacious sibling to the compact Santa Fe Sport, the vehicle has built a strong following thanks to its affordable bundling of features and practicality that often undercuts major players from Toyota (the Highlander), Honda (the Pilot), and Ford (the Explorer) in both areas.
2024 brings a few changes to the Santa Fe formula, although nothing all that dramatic. LED daytime running lights are the most noticeable aspect of its exterior makeover, and its front and rear fascias have spent some time under the scalpel as well, emerging with a new fog light design as well as a slightly chunkier grille, and vertical rather than horizontal reflectors out back. It’s a handsome sport-utility vehicle, one whose somewhat imposing presence suggests a higher sticker than its $30k starting price. Even the Limited model that served as my week-long tester (positioned just below the slightly more expensive Limited Ultimate) barely broke the $43,000 mark with its all-wheel drive and safety-loaded Tech Package, and with either of those elements out of the picture you’re below $39,000.
Crack the door to the Hyundai’s cabin and you come back down to Earth – at least, a little – in terms of the materials used throughout its interior. I personally found the passenger compartment design to be pleasing to the eye, but the Santa Fe Limited’s focus on function was evident by the monochromatic presentation of the soft, textured plastics, broken up by chrome-colored surrounds on the dash and door panels and wood-look trim inserts.
One aspect of the 2023 Hyundai Santa Fe that hasn’t been altered in the slightest is its enormous amount of passenger and cargo space. Although available with a second row bench (base SE editions) that boosts total seating to seven, my Limited tester was outfitted with two captain’s chairs, which offer a walk-through space between them as well as fold and flip forward action to make it easier to reach the rearmost accommodations. As with most mid-size SUVs, that final row is best left to children since adults will find their knees jackknifed up in front of them due to the low perch of each cushion. Better yet – fold them flat and enjoy the 41 cubic feet of total storage space on offer inside the Hyundai Santa Fe, a figure that almost doubles to 80 cubes with the second row out of the picture as well. Add in the ability to pop the hatch simply by standing in front of it with the key fob in pocket (something that will surprise first-time drivers more than once), and you’ve got a recipe for a very useful vehicle that is at the very least the peer of each of its similarly-sized SUV competitors.
I hesitate to use words like ‘alternative’ when discussing the 2023 Hyundai Santa Fe within the context of other three-row mid-size SUVs. Hyundai is well past having to prove itself to potential buyers based on value alone, yet it continues to make over-delivering in terms of features a core part of its brand identity. Despite its more modest sales figures, the Santa Fe deserves your full attention if you’ve ever thought of adding a mainstream seven-passenger daily driver to your driveway. Throw in one of the most comprehensive new car drivetrain warranties in the business (10 years / 100,000 miles), and this Hyundai hauler could very well end up being the last vehicle you have to buy before the kids head off to college.
As you know by now, the handset is being assembled by Taiwan-based contract manufacturers Pegatron (an Asustek spin-off) and Hon Hai Precision Industry. The latter – also known under the Western moniker Foxconn – will be churning out iPhone 4 units this year, to be joined by Pegatron in 2012. Pegatron is reportedly tasked with building approximately one in seven iPhone 4S units. Tapping the economies of scale and long-term supply contracts, Apple is able to build iPhone 4S cheaper than its competitors while preserving traditionally high margins which are the envy of the industry.
Deutsche Bank analyst Chris Whitmore estimated in a note to clients Monday the iPhone 4S bill of materials in the $170-$220 range, depending on capacity. The figure translates to manufacturing margins between 71 and 73 percent, roughly in line with manufacturing margins for the previous-generation iPhone 4. Note that bill of materials excludes other costs associated with assembly, packaging, distribution, sales, marketing, licensing, research and development and more. As for sales potential and profitability, Asymco’s Horace Dediu praised the current iPhone family price matrix, seen right below.
The current iPhone family price matrix, courtesy of Asymco.
The analyst observed that “there is now an iPhone for every budget”, ranging from the free of charge iPhone 3GS to the $99 8GB iPhone 4 to the 16GB/32GB/64GB iPhone 4S costing $199/$299/$399 and all the way up to the unlocked 64GB iPhone 4S priced at $849. Estimating the price of a contract-free, unlocked iPhone 4S ($649/$749/$849 for the 16GB/32GB/64GB version), Dediu concludes it is “very nearly the price that operators themselves pay (excluding any volume discount)”. No surprises here, folks, the iPhone 4S remains a money-making machine. In fact, it’s more profitable than 4G Droids.
While dudes over at iPhoneItalia have taken a peek under the iPhone 4S’s hood, a thorough X-ray and teardown analysis by Chipworks and iFixit is needed to understand how Apple engineered the product. Early benchmarks confirm that iPhone 4S is twice as fast with seven times faster graphics, indicating a clock frequency of 800MHz (versus 1GHz in iPad 2). Meanwhile, UBS Research put together a list of potential key suppliers of components for the iPhone 4S (seen after the break).
Corning Glass, TPK Holdings and Wintek are being listed as touch screen suppliers. DIGITIMES thinks Apple shifted its touch panel orders among suppliers “due to a product flaw found at Wintek’s panels”. As a result, TPK Holdings’ September revenues spiked 53.7 sequentially and 139.7 percent annually while Wintek’s revenues declined 18.4 monthly and 4.5 percent annually “as Apple rejected a batch of defective touch panels for iPhone 4S”.
Sony supplies Apple with the eight-megapixel CMOS sensor for iPhone 4S, while Largan Precision is being credited with all-new optics.
Providers of the iPhone 4S’s improved camera system include CMOS supplier Sony (confirming a 9to5Mac report from April), camera modules from Sharp and LG Innotek and all-new optics with five lens instead of four, courtesy of Largan Precision and Genius Electronic Optical. It’s also possible that OmniVision joined Sony as a backup CMOS sensor supplier as they announced a thin 1080p camera sensor back in May. Most notably, however, Samsung has remained the manufacturer of Apple’s custom-designed A5 chip, arguably the iPhone’s most important hardware component…
Samsung’s declining semiconductor operations, which contributed to their weak second-quarter earnings, indicated Apple might have taken a significant portion of their business elsewhere in the face of the legal woes plaguing the long-standing partnership between the two companies. Samsung supplies Apple with A4/A5 processors, NAND flash chips and other components for their mobile devices. The Apple account was worth an estimated $5.7 billion last year, or four percent of Samsung’s total sales. Orders grew to a cool 5.8 percent in the first quarter of this year and Apple was projected to take $7.8 billion in parts from Samsung in 2011.
iPhone 4S bill of materials estimate by UBS Research
EETimes first reported back in March that Apple had shifted production of the then unreleased A5 chip for iPad 2 from Samsung to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which failed to materialize at the time. The report asserted the two companies had entered into a foundry relationship (here and here). Reuters followed up in July with the news that TSMC began a test production run of A6 chips on its newest 28-nanometer process and 3D stacking technologies, corroborated by the Taiwan Economic Times.
As yield rates improved, DIGITIMES wrote early August that TSMC received a “rushed order” from an unknown partner last minute. Two weeks later, the publication cited sources saying that Apple had recently signed a foundry partnership agreement for the next-generation CPUs on 28nm and 20nm process technologies. Although all of this seemingly points to a TSMC-manufactured A6 chip for next year’s iPhone and iPad, switching silicon providers usually takes months, if not years. Therefore, we’re not expecting TSMC to take over Apple’s chip biz from Samsung until late next year at the earnest.
In spite of its legal clash with Apple, Samsung manufactured the iPhone 4S’s A5 processor.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Update the detailed information about In Motorola’s Moto G Phone, Apple’s Iphone 4S Has More Than Met Its Match on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!