You are reading the article Has Vista Been Unfairly Savaged By The Media? updated in February 2024 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Has Vista Been Unfairly Savaged By The Media?
Has Vista been unfairly savaged by the media?
As I thought about this question, I decided to go back and look at the early reviews of Windows XP. It seems users were not happy then about the change in the user interface (much like Vista). The “forced” product activation didn’t go over well with users either.
However, other than those two items I found little in the way of negative media coverage for Windows XP.
I didn’t bother to include any gripes about security since this has been a complaint about the Windows operating systems since Windows 95. Quite frankly that is a debate that can go on forever with no end result. Is Microsoft really more vulnerable? Or does their bigger percentage of the desktop market make them appear to be more vulnerable?
I will let others take up that argument, though it’s an inarguable fact that a core improvement behind the Windows XP and Vista builds was security enhancements.
But is that a fair assessment of Microsoft’s latest desktop OS?
Is this Windows Millennium Edition 2.0?
I have a hard time believing this to be so in the case of Vista. Now I have to state that I’ve been working with Windows Vista since the early Beta. (Which I installed on a Dell X1 with 768MB of RAM and a 1.1 GHZ processor.) Believe me, this was not a Vista Capable machine – it was the only machine I had available at the time.
It was ultra portable and allowed me to play around with the new features while I rode the train to work. Having been part of the early Beta tests I was also included as a Vista Master in the book Tricks of the Windows Vista Masters by J. Peter Bruzzese.
Being so deeply involved, for as long as I have been, I know the deeper things of Vista, which is why I don’t believe the OS itself is terrible. The media’s coverage of Windows Vista on the other hand has been at times downright nasty. Nevertheless, it has sometimes been well deserved – take the Mojave experiment, for example.
It is terrible sometimes to watch a train wreck knowing there is absolutely nothing you can do, even if you wanted too. That’s how I feel about the “Mojave” experiment that Microsoft recently conducted. As was noted by Mike Elgan’s article you cannot convince people to like something they don’t like with trickery.
I think our time is better spent finding out what they don’t like it and making some changes that will help people to adopt Vista rather than wanting to reject it even more. Why not take a page from the Windows XP SP2 release?
We all know this was an overhaul of XP (hidden as a service pack). What few gripes users had about XP quickly faded and now XP goes down in history as the most beloved OS from Microsoft ever.
Rather than take that tactic with Vista, here comes Microsoft’s marketing experiment to completely strip away any lest vestige of credibility Windows Vista had left. I am beside myself; did no one at Redmond see that coming?
Why would you create your own bad media coverage?
Vista has been slammed right out of the gate by the media with articles titled “Microsoft execs struggled with Vista too, say internal e-mails,” “Why people hate Vista” and “Forrester: Vista rejected like ‘new Coke’ by enterprises”. These are just a few of the headlines – and, I might add, some of the nicer ones.
But is that really fair? (I know stunts like Mojave make it seem fair).
To these problems you add the soft launch Vista had compared to other Microsoft products. Let us throw in the fact that no one at Redmond has really come out in defense of Vista, and there you have it…a perfect media firestorm.
In light of this all it might seem tough to defend Vista. However, I think if you look at some of the pieces of Vista rather than the whole OS you might see what I am talking about.
Technologies such as Ready Boost are a great addition. With a 2GB RAM upgrade costing roughly $65 for a desktop and about $200 for a laptop, Ready Boost makes for a cheaper solution to additional memory, considering flash devices cost roughly $20 – $40 for 2GB.
Bit Locker drive encryption makes a compelling argument for Vista deployment in the Mobile Enterprise. The sidebar has fast become a favorite feature to Vista users. The vast numbers of “gadgets” that are created and updated daily attest to that fact. The Windows firewall which monitors inbound and outbound traffic, supports IPv6 filtering and full IPSec integration is a jump forward.
Parental Controls are for me the best feature, being the father of a 10- and 3-year-old respectively. Having the ability to set time limits, restrict Web sites and applications and, even more importantly, receive activity reports is invaluable.
Has Vista been treated unfairly? The right answer is yes – and no. The media had jumped down Vista’s throat immediately (unfair). However, Microsoft has not given much in the way of alleviating the complaints (fair).
I also think that appreciation will come years after Vista has gone off into the sunset.
You're reading Has Vista Been Unfairly Savaged By The Media?
When trying to install a role or feature (like Windows Security Updates or Server Backup feature) to the Windows Server, the feature installation fails and some users get to see a message saying The component store has been corrupted, error 0x80073712. Instead of the Add Roles and Features Wizard completing successfully, this message pops up! We will talk about solutions that may help you resolve this isue. The entire error message for this Windows Server wizard looks like this-
The request to add or remove features on the specified server failed. Installation of one or more roles, role services, or features failed. The component store has been corrupted. Error: 0x80073712The component store has been corrupted, 0x80073712
To fix The component store has been corrupted, error 0x80073712 on Windows Server, you can use the following solutions:
Run the DISM tool
Use the System File Checker tool
Add WinSxS folder to exclusion to Windows Security.
Let’s check these options.1] Run the DISM tool
As the error itself indicates, there is a possibility that the Windows Component Store that stores the files for adding features or roles using Windows Server and other data is corrupted. Maybe that’s why you are getting this component store corrupted error 0x80073712. So, in such a case, you should run the DISM tool (Deployment Image Servicing and Management command-line tool) that can help you check as well as repair Windows Component Store.
For doing so, first, run Command Prompt as an administrator. After this, execute the command to check if Windows Component Store is corrupted. The command is:Dism /Online /Cleanup-Image /CheckHealth
If it is not corrupted, it should show the message No component store corruption detected.
But, if Windows Component Store is corrupted, then run the following command to repair it:Dism /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth
It may take longer than expected time to complete the command and repair process. So, you should wait. Once the process is completed, install the role or service, or feature on Windows Server and see if this works.
The repair process should work and complete as expected, but it might also end up with Error 14098, Error 0x800f0906, or something else.
In that case, you need to run the DISM tool with a locally mounted Windows ISO image file to perform the repair process. For that, execute the command that includes the path of the ISO file and the chúng tôi file that is present in the Sources folder of the ISO file. The command would be:DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth /Source:F:Sourcesinstall.wim:1
Replace F with the drive location where you have mounted the ISO. This should work and solve your issue.
You can also execute the above command with limited use (to skip checking Windows Server Update Services or Windows Update). Your command would be:DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth /Source:F:SourcesInstall.wim:1 /LimitAccess
Related: Fix DISM Errors 87, 112, 50, 11, 1726, 3, 87, 1392, 1393, 1910, etc.2] Use the System File Checker tool
You can also run the System File Checker tool and see if that works. It scans for protected system files and repairs or replaces the corrupt or damaged data with a cached copy. To run the System File Checker tool, first, open the elevated Command Prompt window and then execute the following command:Sfc /scannow
Let the command complete and it should be able to repair all the corrupt files (if any). After this, you can try to perform the task you were doing on your Windows Server and it should be complete without interruption.
This post will help you if you see Windows Resource Protection could not perform the requested operation message.3] Add WinSxS folder to exclusion to Windows Security
This option seems to work for one of the users having the same problem. It was the antivirus conflict with the WinSxS folder because of which this component store has been corrupted error 0x80073712 appears on Windows Server. So, you need to add an exclusion to Windows Security for the WinSxS folder and this may get rid of this problem.
If you use some other security tool, then look for exclusions or whitelist or something similar option in your antivirus security settings and add the WinSxS folder there.
You may also need to put chúng tôi on the Exclusion list.
I hope this will help.
Also read: How to remove Roles and Features in Windows ServerHow do I fix error code 0x80073712?
If you get error code 0x80073712 for Windows Update on your Windows 11/10 computer, then you can fix Windows Update error 0x80073712 using the DISM tool, Windows Update Troubleshooter, repairing hard drive errors, etc. On the other hand, if you get a 0x80073712 error for Windows Server, then the solutions covered in this post might be useful. Check them out.How do I repair Windows components?
If you see Windows Update components must be repaired error while troubleshooting Windows Update, then you can use the following solutions to fix this issue:
Reset the Windows Update component to default
Repair corrupt Windows Update files
Use Windows Update Troubleshooter.
Read next: How to use Windows Server Migration Tool.
5 Ways to Fix This Page Has Been Blocked by Chrome Extension Extensions can be the root cause of such Chrome browser errors
We can see how receiving this error can become frustrating, so here’s a fix guide.
A website is blocked because Google believes that it could potentially be dangerous.
In this article, you will learn everything there is to know about this nasty error code.
Try Opera One, a browser with various functionalities already built-in!
A flawless browser like Opera has most functions already under the hood.
Here’s what’s included by default:
Easy and intuitive workspace management
Ad-blocker mode integrated to load pages faster
WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger
Customizable Ul and AI-friendly
⇒ Get Opera One
If you are also troubled by this issue, here are a couple of troubleshooting tips to fix this webpage that was blocked by an extension Chrome error in Windows.Why does it say this page has been blocked by Chrome?
Don’t worry, there’s no need to turn off all the lights in your home and expect some secret agency to come knocking at your door.
In fact, most of the time, a website is blocked because Google believes the website might be dangerous and could harm your PC or reveal your personal data.
When these online security protocols kick in, the browser is automatically going to take these safety measures designed for your online protection.
The issue with Chrome is that it occasionally generates false positives. If you need to access restricted geo-blocked content or a web app to access particular pages, we recommend using Opera One.
Its powerful security mechanisms keep tracking away while being subtle in your virtual daily activities. You get a prompt when a website is not secure, but it’s much easier to manage.
Uses certificates to verify the identity of the site owners and if websites are legitimate.
Free Visit websiteHow do you fix requests to the server that have been blocked by an extension Chrome?
An outdated version of Google Chrome may be incompatible with the extensions as well as the web pages. Try updating Google Chrome and check for any improvements.2. Open the webpage in Incognito Mode
Open Chrome and press Ctrl + Shift + N to open the Incognito Mode.
Open the webpage that was giving the error. If the error does not occur in Incognito Mode, it is possible that the issue is with one of the Google Chrome extensions.
Expert tip:3. Disable and delete the problematic extension
Once you have confirmed the issue is with one of the Google Chrome extensions, you need to disable it.5. Use a different browser
If the issue persists, use an alternate browser. UR Browser is a popular browser with some of the best privacy features. It also comes with a built-in option, so you don’t have to use install a third-party VPN client.
Download and install UR Browser to fix this webpage was blocked by an extension Chrome errors.
This error message will usually be received by users when an extension is blocking this content, either due to a compatibility conflict, or the fact that the extension has become corrupted.
The browser’s cache can also play a part in this, so you might want to think about clearing it if you start experiencing this.
Or, in some cases, you will really have to contact the site owner in order to unblock the content. However, usually, just:
unblock a website from the Restricted sites list
reset your Hosts file to unblock websites
use a VPN to unblock websites
use Google Chrome extensions to unblock websites
So, in case this page has been blocked by an extension, Google is blocked by an extension, or this page has been blocked by chrome err_blocked_by_client, now you have a better understanding of the issue.
Was this page helpful?
Start a conversation
The IP address is the digital identification assigned to every device on a network uniquely by the ISP or the router to transfer the data packets. Whenever a website recognizes your IP as a suspicious one, it restricts the packet transfer with your device and sees the error “Your IP Has Been Temporarily Blocked.”
Usually, you can get this issue if you perform suspicious activities on the internet from your device. It could be that you tried to log in with incorrect credentials multiple times, used an extension to log in or browse through the webpage, or violated the host’s rules. Or, it can be simply that the webpage has been banned by your Internet Service Provider (ISP).
You can bypass this error by either masking your IP or using a different IP for your device. We have discussed the very methods to do that in this article.
If your IP is simply blocked by multiple login attempts, or crossing the login limits for the day, then you can wait till the ban is lifted. Sometimes, you may have to wait a day or more as well.
However, most of the time, waiting is not an option. So, what more can you do to solve the issue?
If you frequently find your IP getting banned, then it can be the work of malware on your PC. The virus inside the computer can perform suspicious activities in the background causing the issue.
You should perform a complete virus scan using an antivirus program to remove the malware from your system.
Open the Run dialog box.
Type ms-settings:windowsdefender to open Windows Security.
Windows Defender will find the malware and remove it from your system.
Check if the problem is solved now. If not, then you can start applying the fixes given below to bypass or lift the ban on your IP.
Sometimes, the issue with the DNS server can also lead to an error. You should try changing the DNS of your network connection to solve it. Modifying the DNS server can change the IP assigned to your device, and the ban can be bypassed.
Press Windows + ‘R’ to open the Run dialog box.
Type ncpa.cpl and hit Enter.
Select the Use the following DNS server addresses box.
You should be able to browse the site now after changing the DNS address.
Virtual Private Network or VPN masks your IP address by connecting your device to the internet through a tunnel. Your IP will be routed to another one used by the VPN, and that address will be used to connect to the internet.
You can access the webpage using a VPN easily. You can use a paid or unpaid VPN service and connect through it. You can also access the webpages that are banned by your ISP, as well as bypass censorship.
However, since some web services do not allow the usage of a VPN, they may detect and ban you from that IP as well.
Also, the IP used by the VPN may be on the blacklist. You can try connecting to a different server available in the VPN app and accessing the webpage again.
Similarly, you can also choose to access the internet using proxy servers. Proxy servers are similar to VPNs but possess vulnerabilities in terms of security. Still, if you want to use proxies instead of VPN, here are the steps to set it up manually.
Search for free proxy servers on the internet or get paid ones and note the IP and Port.
Press Windows + ‘X’ and choose Settings.
Switch the toggle bar to On.
Now try accessing the site.
You can also use TOR (The Onion Router) browser to access the website. It is a free browser that masks your IP by bouncing the data packets through multiple IPs. The host website sees that a different IP is sending the request and allow you to browse the site.
However, the TOR browser is quite slow due to the use of multiple nodes for transferring data. Also, it has a bad reputation for being used for illegal activities because of its excellent privacy options, even though it is totally legal.
You can also bypass the IP blockage error by changing your device’s public IP address. However, there is only one way to do it, and that is to wait until the ISP assigns a new public IP to your modem. Usually, the DHCP lease for the IPs lasts a few hours. You should wait till the lease expires and a new IP is assigned to your network.
Some of us may confuse Local IP addresses with Public IP. Releasing or changing the Local IP, either static or dynamic, will not solve the issue. This is because the websites see your public IP while trying to communicate with them, not the local one.
Every device in the network is assigned a unique IP address by the router. Likewise, the network device also gets another IP when they are connected to different networks. For instance, your PC will be assigned another IP address whenever you switch from WiFi to Ethernet.
So, to actually bypass the ban, you should access the webpage by using another internet connection.
The drawback here is it may not always be feasible to find multiple networks.
It is not always feasible to use a VPN, proxy, or TOR browser to mask your IP address. If you have not done any tasks that breach the regulations of the website, then you can request your ISP to look into the issue and release the ban permanently.
Similarly, you can also request your ISP to solve the issue if your device’s IP is blacklisted. This can happen if some malware on your PC runs suspicious tasks. Or, sometimes, the website ban a range of IPs, and your IP may happen to be in that range. If you want to find out whether your IP is blacklisted or not, please follow the steps below.
Open the Run dialog box.
Enter cmd to open Command Prompt.
Type ipconfig and hit Enter.
Check whether your IP is on the blacklist and contact the webpage to remove it from the list.
Most websites check your device’s public IP address instead of the local IP assigned by your router. So, you can also check if your public IP is on that list. To find your public IP, go to the websites such as chúng tôi .
Bitcoin’s price bounced back on the charts after undergoing yet another price correction, with the same settling above the $32,000-price level, at press time. In fact, after seeing its value fall by over 15 percent on the 20th of January, the coin was on its way to breach its immediate resistances at the $33,000 and $34,000-levels.
In the past, Bitcoin has been troubled by minor corrections on the charts after falling from the ATH it set around the $42k-level. However, Bitcoin returning to claim a position above $35k, for example, might be a clear sign that the bulls are back in control. This raises the question – In the short-term market for Bitcoin, how probable is such a scenario?
Given the cryptocurrency’s overall market sentiment, traders may have to wait a while before the $35k-price level is claimed. In the long term, given Bitcoin’s scarcity and the fact that it has in the past gone past this price level, the $35k-level should be easily capturable.
According to Santiment’s data, strong bearish sentiments with regard to Bitcoin are around at the moment. Santiment’s Weighted Social Sentiment metric is a clear indicator of the overall sentiment traders have towards an asset. In Bitcoin’s case, in spite of it rebounding today, many traders seem to be a bit hesitant at these levels.
For assets like Bitcoin that work in a speculative market, crowd sentiment is a key attribute. While it is wise to buy when the price takes a dip, the fact that after Bitcoin fell to the $30k-price range there were quite a few corrections without a strong uptrend could be one of the reasons traders are hesitating to buy more BTC and help its price move north.
In fact, taking a closer look at the two corrections that happened on Bitcoin’s charts over the past week, Santiment highlighted that while traders were keen on buying the dip during the first correction, there was a bit of skepticism during the second dip that happened yesterday.
To better understand social sentiments, Google trends data can also come in handy. Taking a look at user interest in Bitcoin world over, a slump over the past few days was evident, with this finding shedding new light on the cryptocurrency’s recent price performance.
According to Google’s data, a value of 100 is the peak popularity for a term, with Bitcoin seeing its levels fall to 59 at press time, from 100 on the 11th of January.
With Bitcoin setting new highs this month, it has also, in turn, redefined what it means to buy low and sell high. Bitcoin’s press time price point is still quite steep in comparison to where it was under a year ago and one of the reasons why traders may be a bit apprehensive during these price corrections could be because the price is still in quite an expensive range.
Additionally, another reason why the bearishness continues for Bitcoin could be because of the $10k drop that Bitcoin underwent, and even after traders ‘bought the dip,’ the price has only increased marginally and ended up seeing yet another price correction. To a certain extent, one can argue that this could be the reason why in the short-term, the bearishness prevails.
However, given Bitcoin’s predicted trajectory, a $30k-price point is likely to be quite a rarity in the coming months and traders accumulating the coin may find themselves quite fortunate soon.
A middle-aged, mixed-race woman is now the third person to be cured of HIV after receiving donated stem cells with an HIV-resistant mutation from umbilical cord blood.
The woman, referred to as the “New York patient,” also had leukemia, and received the umbilical cord blood four years ago to treat her cancer. Since then, her HIV has been in remission. She is the first woman and the first mixed-race person to be cured of HIV through this blood transplant method, which is a variation of a previously successful treatment. Two previous patients, Timothy Ray Brown or “the Berlin patient,” and Adam Castillejo or “the London patient,” received adult stem cell transplants in 2008 and 2024, respectively. Brown has since passed away from cancer—though his HIV stayed in remission.
Brown, Castillejo, and the New York patient all received transplants as part of their cancer treatment. All three developed immune systems that could fight off the virus, because the transplant donors had HIV-resistant mutations. This treatment has not been attempted in anyone with HIV who also does not have cancer.
The woman who received cord blood also experienced smoother recovery than the two men who received adult stem cells—Brown and Castillejo both experienced graft versus host disease, in which the donated stem cells attack the host’s body. She was able to leave the hospital by day 17 after her surgery.
Because umbilical cord blood is much more widely available than adult stem cells, the success of the New York patient’s transplant bodes well for future patients. Using umbilical cord blood is an innovation that could open up HIV treatment to many more patients of more racially diverse backgrounds, especially since cord blood does not need to be matched as closely to the recipient’s blood as other types of bone marrow transplants.
[Related: The first people have received an experimental mRNA HIV vaccine]
A wider pool of patients could potentially receive this cord blood treatment as opposed to adult stem cells—donor registries are mostly Caucasian, which makes finding a donor (and especially one who has an HIV-resistant mutation) exceptionally difficult for people of color.
“The fact that she’s mixed race, and that she’s a woman, that is really important scientifically and really important in terms of the community impact,” Steven Deeks, an AIDS expert at the University of California who was not involved with this patient’s case, told The New York Times. Globally, 52 percent of adults living with HIV are women, and yet women make up just 11 percent of participants in HIV treatment trials.
Sharon Lewin, president-elect of the International AIDS Society, told The Washington Post that this is an exciting case, but ultimately not realistic for the masses of people dealing with HIV infections. “A bone-marrow transplant is not a viable large-scale strategy for curing HIV, but it does present a proof of concept that HIV can be cured,” she said. Not every patient will be able to undergo a bone marrow transplant, but for those who do, this is promising.
The doctors involved with the New York patient are nevertheless excited at the success and potential that umbilical cord stem cells offer for future treatments. “This provides hope for the use of cord blood cells … to achieve HIV remission for individuals requiring transplant for other diseases,” Yvonne J. Bryson, an infectious-diseases physician at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles who presented the case, told The Washington Post.
Why this transplant with umbilical cord stem cells worked better than those with adult stem cells is still unknown. Perhaps they’re more adaptable, Deeks told The New York Times. “Umbilical stem cells are attractive,” he added. “There’s something magical about these cells and something magical perhaps about the cord blood in general that provides an extra benefit.”
Update the detailed information about Has Vista Been Unfairly Savaged By The Media? on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!