You are reading the article Beats Studio 3 Vs Sony Wh updated in February 2024 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Beats Studio 3 Vs Sony Wh
Wireless headphones are popular accessories, and new ones come out every year. While it’s always fun to turn your attention to the next thing in audio tech, the fact is that you don’t need to buy the latest and greatest. Today, we’ll look at the Beats Studio 3 vs Sony WH-1000XM4. Both are years-old active noise-canceling (ANC) headphones with some neat software features. Time to find out which headphones are worth your dollar.
The Beats Studio 3 and Sony WH-1000XM4 are both years-old premium headphones. Here’s an overview of their main differences:
The Studio 3 Wireless have Apple-exclusive features, and the WH-1000XM4 work identically across operating systems.
Both headphones use spatial audio, but only the Sony WH-1000XM4 offer personalization.
The ANC on the WH-1000XM4 is better for commuting than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless.
The WH-1000XM4 have a 30-hour battery life, while the Studio 3 have a 22-hour battery life.
The WH-1000XM4 charge via USB-C, and the Studio 3 Wireless use the outdated micro-USB port.
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless come in far more color options than the WH-1000XM4.
Beats Studio 3 vs Sony WH-1000XM4: Specs
Sony’s user experience contrasts with the Beats Studio 3, which have some Apple-exclusive features. This makes sense: Apple owns Beats. With the integrated W1 chip, the Studio 3 have hands-free “Hey, Siri” for asking questions. You can also use automatic device switching across Apple hardware. Listeners can also hear Apple Spatial Audio through the Studio 3. Of course, like Sony’s take on reality audio, this requires compatible audio content. Beats provides Android users with a spartan app that lets you toggle ANC on or off and access firmware updates. Android and iPhone owners can all enjoy one-step pairing for the Beats Studio 3.
The Sony WH-1000XM4 use Bluetooth 5.0, a whole generation newer than the Studio 3 Wireless’ Bluetooth 4.0. Sony’s headphones also support more Bluetooth audio codecs for better audio quality on Android devices. With the WH-1000XM4, you get your pick of SBC, AAC, and LDAC. Meanwhile, the Studio 3 support just SBC and AAC.
Beats Studio 3 vs Sony WH-1000XM4: Sound quality
Beats Studio 3 Wireless microphone demo (Ideal conditions):
Beats Studio 3 Wireless microphone demo (Windy conditions):
Beats Studio 3 vs Sony WH-1000XM4: Price
Beats Studio 3 Wireless: $349
Sony WH-1000XM4: $349
Beats Studio 3 vs Sony WH-1000XM4: Which headphones should you buy?
Both pairs of headphones are good, even by today’s standards, but Sony’s have more modern hardware and a more expansive feature set. With Sony, you get USB-C charging, a custom EQ, and personalized spatial audio. These headphones have less clamping force than Beats, making them a bit more comfortable too.
There are still a few good reasons to consider the Studio 3 Wireless. If you have an iPhone, these headphones support many Apple-integrated features like auto device switching and “Hey, Siri.” Moreover, the Studio 3 default sound profile is more pleasing than the WH-1000XM4. Granted, you’re stuck with that default sound, unless you download a third-party app.Which headphones would you rather own?
Ultimately, if you want a more future-proofed purchase, get the Sony WH-1000XM4. You have fewer color options with Sony’s headphones but a much better user experience if you hop between operating systems.
Beats Studio 3 Wireless Headphones
Beats Studio 3 Wireless Headphones
Good battery life • Solid connection
Solid battery life and great sounding wireless headphones
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless over-ear headphones deliver premium sound while blocking external noise with active noise cancelation.
See price at Amazon
See price at Amazon
Great ANC • Sound quality • Connectivity options • Auto-wear detection
An exceptional pair of noise canceling headphones.
High-quality Bluetooth codecs, great sound, improved noise-canceling, good battery life, and smart features like auto-pause and Bluetooth multipoint make the Sony WH-1000XM4 a great all-round pair of headphones.
See price at Amazon
See price at Best Buy
Neither set of headphones is waterproof, nor do they carry any kind of water-resistant IP rating.
Yes, both the Studio 3 and WH-1000XM4 have embedded microphones for phone calls, video chats, and voice recordings.
The Beats Studio 3 have active noise canceling that, while good, lags behind today’s flagship headphones.
Yes, the Beats Studio 3 support Apple’s Spatial Audio feature, but they don’t have head tracking or Spatial Audio optimization like the AirPods Max or newer AirPods do.
The Sony WH-1000XM4 are best for gaming when you plug them in. A wired connection means you won’t run into any audio-visual lag, which is important for gaming reaction time.
You're reading Beats Studio 3 Vs Sony Wh
This is a case of horses for courses. The 8in form factor is great for reading, or watching and playing whilst on the move. If you need to stand up on your commute, for instance. Meanwhile Sony’s 10in tablet is a stylish and powerful full-sized slate. If you are in the market for an Android tablet, Sony’s devices are high-quality, fairly priced.
Sony recently gave the whole world of tech the eyes, and launched the Xperia Z4… as a tablet. We’re still waiting to find out what is happening with the Xperia Z4 smartphone, and indeed whether Sony is committed at all to making
Sony’s latest tablet is the Xperia Z4 Tablet – a 10in slate that is, confusingly, an update to the excellent Xperia Z2 Tablet. It means that Sony is currently selling that 10in tablet, as well as a smaller, Kindle-sized 8in slate improbably called the Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact. Snappy, huh?
If you are in the market for a non-iPad, consumption tablet, these are two of the best. So we set out to find out what separates Sony’s little n large. It’s the only Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet comparison review you need. (Also see: Best tablets.)Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet: UK price & availability
Sony has now revealed that the Xperia Z4 Tablet will cost £499 when it becomes available to buy in the UK in June.
So far, £499 is the price Sony has revealed for the WiFi-only model with 32GB of space and it comes with a keyboard, so it’s possible that you’ll be able to pick up the Xperia Z4 Tablet at a lower price without the keyboard. The 4G version is £579 with the keyboard.
At launch the Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact was priced from £329. Now you can pick up the most basic Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact from just £299. That’s for the 16GB Wi-Fi only version – which right now is the only flavour on offer from Sony’s UK website.Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet: Design & build
The Xperia Z4 Tablet has a 10.1in display. It is a square, blocky-looking device even thinner than its direct predecessor, the Xperia Z2 Tablet, at 6.1mm compared with 6.4mm. This is an exceptionally thin tablet.
Light, too. The WiFi model of the Xperia Z4 Tablet is 392g, while the 4G LTE model is 396g. It is a delight to hold, particularly impressive considering its 10in display. And the Xperia Z4 Tablet is waterproof up to the highest rating available: IP68. The headphone port and microUSB ports don’t even need covers to make the device waterproof, so feel free to use the Xperia Z4 Tablet in the bath or by the poolside without a worry.
The Xperia Z3 Compact is one seriously thin and light 8in tablet. At 6.4 mm and 270 g is is thicker, but lighter than its big brother. It’s almost like holding a phone because the device is so slender – holding it one-handed is a breeze. The stainless steel frame looks great and we like the rounded curves of the cover. The Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact will be available in black or white only.
It’s also dust- and waterproof, with a soft touch plastic rear cover which matches that of the Xperia Z2 Tablet. This may not look quite as impressive but provides much better grip. Waterproofing in this case means slightly fiddly flaps (apart from the headphone jack) but they do hide everything neatly away, too.Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet: Display & hardware
Taking a closer look at the screen on the Xperia Z4 Tablet, you’ll find a 10.1in display with a 2560 x 1600 resolution, which equates to an impressive 299 ppi. The Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact has an 8in screen with a Full HD (1920 x 1200) resolution. This makes for a pixel density of 283 ppi. Not quite as impressive as big brother, but not something you will notice, either.
Inside the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 processor, which is both octa-core and 64-bit. It’s paired with 3GB RAM, 32GB of storage and a microSD card slot for adding up to 128GB more.
Connectivity-wise, you’ll find 11ac WiFi, NFC, Bluetooth 4.1 and MHL 3.0, as well as an optional 4G LTE model for the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet.
Sony’s newest tablet has High-Res audio, too, with front-facing stereo speakers, digital noise cancelling support, automatic headphone compensation and a new LDAC codec which supposedly transmits data three times more efficiently than Bluetooth.
We’ve not yet been able to test this claim, but Sony suggests that you can expect a whopping 17 hours of video playback from the Xperia Z4 Tablet’s 6000mAh battery.
Inside the Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 quad-core processor which is the same as previous Sony devices such as the Xperia Z2 Tablet but the chip is clocked higher at 2.5GHz. Alongside this is 3GB of RAM and we can report smooth performance during our time with the tablet.
In terms of storage, there are 16- and 32 GB models (11GB available after firmware on the former and 26 GB for the latter) but Sony offers a microSD card slot for adding up to 128GB. Again: right now we can see only the 16GB version on sale direct from Sony, although the other models are in stock elsewhere.
Wireless includes 11ac Wi-Fi, NFC and Bluetooth 4.0 LE but no IR Blaster for taking control of device like TVs. There’s also no wireless charging but there is a dock connector on the side if you wish to buy a compatible accessory – Sony’s official Magnetic Charging Dock DK39 costs £39.
It’s also great to see front-facing stereo speakers although they do distort fairly badly when the volume is at the upper end.
Despite clocking the processor higher, Sony touts an impressive 15 hours video playback from the Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact’s 4500mAh battery. (See also: Best budget tablets UK.)Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet: Cameras
On the rear of the Xperia Z4 Tablet is an 8.1 Mp camera, which uses Sony’s Exmor RS sensor. The front-facing camera is a 5.1Mp camera with a wide angle lens, which will allow you to get more people in the frame.
If you’re into tablet photography then the Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact has a pretty decent 8.1 Mp rear facing camera with an Exmor RS sensor – about on par with the Galaxy Tab S 8.4. However, the high quality 2.2 Mp front camera is arguably more useful for video calls.
With both phones you can play around with plenty of camera apps such as Sound Photo, AR fun, Face in, Multi camera and more. Using the Superior auto mode will automatically mean 6 Mp 16:9 photos and Full HD video so if you want the full 8 Mp (at 4:3), switch to manual mode. (See also: The 29 best Android tablets of 2024 UK.)Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet: Software
The Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet runs Android 5.0 Lollipop, Google’s latest version of its operating system. The Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact comes with an earlier version of Android OS in the form of 4.4.4 KitKat – an upgrade to Android L will come in due course, we’re told.
With both tablets Sony has added its own interface, though it’s not much different from stock Android aside from the pre-loaded Sony apps such as Walkman, Album, PlayStation and Lifelog.
There’s also PS4 Remote Play, which lets you play PlayStation 4 games on the device from the console over the same WiFi network.Specs Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet: Specs
Android 5.0 Lollipop
10.1in IPS Triluminos screen, 2560×1600, 300ppi, 500cd/m2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 processor, 64-bit
32GB internal storage, microSD card slot (up to 128GB)
8.1Mp rear camera with Exmor RS
5.1Mp wide angle front camera
Nano-SIM (LTE model)
6000 mAh battery
392g (Wi-Fi), 396g (LTE)
Although we like the XZ3, when you break it down there’s not much that’s new here with the majority of specs and features staying the same – albeit for the same launch price. If you already have an XZ2 then the upgrade is very difficult to justify just one year on, since you’re mainly getting a new screen and better front camera inside the slightly thinner chassis. If you’re trying to choose between the two then this is also tricky. Saving a fair bit of money is tempting, but you will be much happier with the new model if you can stretch your budget.
As expected, Sony has a new flagship phone for 2023 in the Xperia XZ3. There’s no compact model this year, so that leaves us to compare it with its predecessor, the XZ2.
The new model comes in at the same launch price, although upgrades are fairly limited. Here we compare them on price, design and specs in detail to help you choose which one to buy or whether to upgrade.Xperia XZ2 vs XZ3: Price and availability
A rare thing in the tech world now, Sony has kept the price of the XZ3 the same as its predecessor. So that means it costs £699 – it’s $899 in the US.
Since the XZ2 is now the old model, you can get it cheaper (if you don’t have it already) – although the discount isn’t much if you buy direct at £649. However, if you go to Amazon you can get the handset for £539 or $699.
So that’s a reasonable difference. We’ll look at whether it’s worth upgrading if you already have the XZ2 or which to choose if you don’t.Xperia XZ2 vs XZ3: Design and build
We’ve been waiting for Sony to change its design language for a while (that’s an understatement) and the XZ2 brought that, but we were a bit disappointed.
We’re pleased that the XZ3 is a much more desirable handset compared to the XZ2. It’s not an overhaul in design, but the new 2023 phone makes some much needed tweaks.
Namely that the phone is thinner at 9.9mm, down from 11.1mm. It’s not huge on paper but makes a big difference when you hold chúng tôi XZ3 isn’t much lighter – 5g down at 193g – but a bigger battery is a good reason for this.
The main design change is that the front has curved edges, a bit like the Galaxy S9 and previous Samsung phones. It helps the phone feel thinner than it is.
In true Sony style, the new phone comes in new colours so Forest Green and Bordeaux Red might tempt you.
It’s still IP68 waterproof and there’s no headphone jack. With a tall 18:9 screen, the fingerprint scanner is still on the back and many of us here think it’s too low down the phone for comfort.Xperia XZ2 vs XZ3:
Specs and features
As is often the case with a new generation of smartphone, there are some specs and features which remain the same and some that are new. So, we’re going to highlight them in sections.
What’s the same?
Here’s a list of what is the same no matter which phone you opt for, since there are some of the key things that haven’t been upgraded for the XZ3:
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
4GB of RAM
64GB of storage
Micro-SD card slot
No headphone jack
19Mp rear camera
That’s quite a lot of things that are still the same a year later and we didn’t include smaller things like Wi-Fi and USB-C.
So what has changed on the spec sheet? Well mainly a new screen which is Sony’s first OLED panel for better colours and contrast. It’s larger at 6in but avoids getting a notch and retains a Quad HD resolution.
As mentioned earlier, the screen now has curved edges and a feature called Side Sense means you can tap on the side to bring up your most used apps and shortcuts.
There are two other notable differences with a larger 3300mAh and a higher resolution front camera. It’s 13Mp and has an impressive f/1.9 aperture.
Check the verdict section below to see whether you should upgrade or which to choose.
Here is a run-down of the specs of the Xperia XZ2 and the Xperia XZ3 side-by-side:
Sony Xperia XZ2Sony Xperia XZ3Operating SystemAndroid 8.0 OreoAndroid 9 PieDisplay5.7in Full HD+ (2160×1080) 18:9 IPS LCD HDR6.0in (2160×1080) 18:9 P-OLEDProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Memory4GB RAM4GBStorage64GB (expandable up to 512GB via microSD) 64GB (expandable up to 512GB via microSD)Primary Camera
camera with dual autofocus
19Mp, f/2.0 camera with dual autofocus Front Camera5Mp, f/2.213Mp, f/1.9Video Recording4K HDR @ 30fps, Super slo-mo 1080p @ 960fps
4K HDR @ 30fps, Super slo-mo 1080p @ 960fps
WiFi11ac dual-band11ac dual-bandGPSYesYesBluetooth5.0 with aptX HD5.0 with aptX HDNFCYesYesFingerprint scannerYes, rearYes, rearWireless chargingYesYesColoursLiquid Black, Liquid Silver, Deep Green/Blue
Black, Silver White, Forest Green, Bordeaux Red
WaterproofIP65/68IP65/68Dimensions153 x 72 x 11.1mm
158 x 73 x 9.9mm
Weight198g193gBattery3180mAh3300mAhRelated stories for further reading Specs Sony Xperia XZ3: Specs
Android 9 Pie
6.0In OLED QHD+ HDR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
64GB storage, microSD up to 512GB
19Mp f/2.0 main camera, 4K HDR recording
13Mp f/1.9 front camera
Nano-SIM (single or dual)
158 x 73 x 9.9mm
As the search industry grows, more niche service organizations appear. These companies usually boast a tagline touting the fact that they “specialize in the search engine optimization of (insert industry here)”… Some companies even go so far as to provide complete web site platforms and content management systems for their clients.
Amazingly, these companies are successful.
It makes me wonder why companies would be willing to pay a premium to receive the same exact product that everyone else in their market has.Invest in YOUR Search Marketing
Search marketing efforts are customized and planned to focus on your specific business goals. Your business is not the same as others in the industry — so why would you want to pay for the same products and services? How in the world can you differentiate yourself from the pack when you have the same web site, the same marketing and the same underlying systems?
YOUR search marketing needs to be unique. That’s not to say that a specialized firm cannot help you… But you must do your homework and review their existing clients’ sites and search marketing efforts. Too many similarities are not a good thing!Template Based Optimization Kills!
While that headline might sound a bit harsh, I have found it to be true. Many niche companies out there who do little more than run your company name and other basic information through a series of templates. Those templates then dictate your page titles, navigational structures, META tags, etc.
Templates are great in certain situations. For example, if you run an eCommerce site with 2,000 products — it makes sense to have an optimized template that allows each product page to be optimized.
For smaller sites (under 100 pages), there’s little use for SEO templating. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that it is counterproductive. If your marketing firm can’t take the time to optimize one hundred pages for you, what good are they really?Demand Customization
Many of these niche companies force search terms on you, telling you that they’re the best match for your business. While it could be true, ask for the supporting information to back this claim up.
Your search terms should cater to what you’re interested in, as well as what will work for your market. Niche firms should have a working knowledge of terms and engines to target — but your input should also shape the terms you measure success.Get Involved Early and Often
As a bottom line, do not allow your firm to dictate what success will be measured by. Customized search marketing is not templated. It’s not off the shelf. And, it’s certainly not something that you shouldn’t have an impact on.
Get involved with your firm’s rep early and often to get a better understanding of what they’re doing to make YOUR business better. Too many people spend money on marketing systems and optimization plans that do little for them.
If you want a GNOME 2-like desktop, the leading contenders are both developed by Linux Mint. Users can choose between Cinnamon, which is built on top of GNOME 3, and Mate, a direct fork of GNOME 2.
Mate and Cinnamon are the default alternatives offered in Linux Mint 14, the current release. Both are highly successful attempts to provide a GNOME 2-like desktop in response to widespread user dissatisfaction with GNOME 3 and Ubuntu’s Unity.
Among experienced users, the two interfaces appear to have been instant successes. Despite having been in development for only a few months when the 2011 LinuxQuestions Members Choice Awards were voted on, Mate received 3.5 percent of the votes for best desktop environment, and Cinnamon 2.5 percent. In the 2012 poll, they did even better, with Cinnamon attracting just under 10 percent of the votes, and Mate 7.5 percent. Although Linux Mint was a popular distribution before either interface emerged, the two seemed to have raised interest in the distribution to even higher levels than before.
But which is right for you?
Nor is the decision made any easier by the renaming of GNOME features within them and the widespread insistence that the two interfaces are different.
One difficulty in comparing Mate and Cinammon is that both rename standard GNOME utilities. Cinnamon, for instance, has forked Mutter, calling its version Muffin. Faced with changes to the GNOME file manager Nautilus, it also preserves the GNOME 2 design under the name of Nemo.
Mate has even more name changes. In Mate, Nautilus becomes Caja. The Gedit text editor becomes Pluma, the document viewer Evince becomes Atril, and the window manager Metacity becomes Marco. Similarly, GConf is renamed mate.conf.
These name changes indicate forks. They distinguish Mate or Cinnamon from GNOME 2 or 3, and—most important of all—allow more than one to coexist on the same system while removing the possibility of conflicts. Yet although the changes are useful, they have the effect of making comparisons more difficult because they obscure what you want to compare.
A second difficulty in making a comparison is that purists are constantly insisting that Cinnamon and Mate are two different interfaces.
Strictly speaking, they are right, of course. In their brief histories, Mate’s development has focused on reviving GNOME 2 for modern usage, while Cinnamon has been more innovative, offering its own set of panel applets and its Expointerface for handling virtual workspaces. Such differences seem likely to increase in future releases.
However, so far, the differences are mostly in the details. The general user experience remains similar in both Cinnamon and Mate. Both offer what some people are starting to refer to as a “classical interface,” consisting of a single screen with a configurable panel and menu with the option for virtual workspaces.
Moreover, their interface are far closer to each other than either is to any other free or proprietary classical desktop. This similarity is enhanced by the Linux Mint branding, which uses the same themes and icons for both.
In Linux Mint 14, the latest release, an observant eye might notice slight differences in the wallpaper, but otherwise, the differences are only noticeable in a few utilities that specifically include Cinnamon in their name or in the About page of a dialog. But without long familiarity or a side-by-side comparison, most users would probably struggle to tell at a glance which is which.
Rather than viewing them as distinct interfaces, Mate and Cinnamon are probably best seen as two different solutions to the problem of providing a classical desktop at a time when GNOME offered only the feature-impoverished fallback mode (which has since been retired with the release of GNOME 3.8).
Alternatively, to use a metaphor that acknowledges the technical differences behind the scene, they are an example of parallel evolution, developments from similar conditions that resemble each other.
Once you compensate for these difficulties, what remains to be compared or contrasted? From a general user’s perspective, much less than you might expect—and even less that seriously undermines the temptation to associate the two interfaces.
As you log in, the first difference you are likely to notice is that Mate begins with a dialog window that lists links to user resources, while Cinnamon does not.
The other obvious differences are cosmetic: Cinnamon’s panel is darker than Mate’s, the menus are slightly different in arrangement, and Mate is more likely to rely on words while Cinnamon uses only icons. Both menus display three columns, with the leftmost column reserved for places and system controls in Mate, and for favorites and system controls in Cinnamon. In both, the middle column is for first level menu items, and the third for displaying the contents of whatever is selected in the middle. Most of the icons are the same, although Mate places its search field at the bottom right and Cinnamon places its on the top left.
The flagship OnePlus 3 has been priced at 27,999 and competes with the likes of Xiaomi Mi5. Xiaomi’s flagship device, Mi 5 has been priced at Rs. 24,999. We compared both of the devices to help you decide which device is best for you.OnePlus 3 vs Xiaomi Mi 5 Specifications
[table id=569 /]Design & Build
The OnePlus 3 comes with a metal unibody design this time. OnePlus has taken just 3 phones to move from plastic to completely metal build. The metal body gives the phone a premium look and differentiates the device from its predecessors. The OnePlus 3 is 7.4 mm thick and weighs 159 grams.
Coming to the Xiaomi Mi 5, it comes with a metal frame and a glass back. It is 7.3 mm thick and weighs just 129 grams. The Xiaomi Mi 5 is lighter due to a smaller display and as it comes with a glass rear panel.
As far as build and design are concerned, it is an extremely close race between the OnePlus 3 and the Xiaomi Mi 5. They both look extremely good, but we find the OnePlus 3 to be better to hold. Both the phones are slippery, but the Mi 5’s glass back makes it more prone to damage than the OnePlus 3.Display
Both the phones come with the same screen resolution, but the OnePlus 3’s display is slightly bigger than the Mi 5’s. While the difference is not big, the OnePlus 3 could be a little more uncomfortable to hold than the Mi 5. In terms of color reproduction and brightness, both the phones are very good. However, the true blacks of the AMOLED panel tip the scales in favour of the OnePlus 3 here, as size is not a constraint for me.Hardware and Storage
Both the flagship devices are powered by Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 820 processor. The OnePlus 3 comes with 6 GB of RAM while the Mi 5 comes with only 3 GB of RAM. The OnePlus 3 is the obvious winner in terms of RAM.
Coming to internal storage, the OnePlus 3 comes with 64 GB of internal storage and the Mi 5 again is behind with only 32 GB of internal storage. Additionally, the OnePlus 3 comes with UFS 2.0 storage which is much faster than the standard eMMC storage in the Xiaomi Mi 5. Neither of the devices support microSD expansion.Camera
OnePlus 3 comes with a 16 MP primary camera with f/2.0 aperture, PDAF, 1/2.8″ Sony IMX 298 Sensor. The Mi 5 also comes with a 16 MP primary camera with f/2.0 aperture, PDAF, 1/2.8″ Sony IMX 298 Sensor. Both the devices feature the same primary camera.
In comparison, I found both the cameras very charming when it comes to day light performance. With the help of stable and smooth camera UI, it becomes easier to capture great shots but when it comes to details and clarity, the OnePlus 3 is a little ahead. Although none of them are good enough to be called as a good low light camera. For more details, you can refer the image gallery below.Camera Samples Battery
Continuing the trend of similar specs, both the OnePlus 3 and Xiaomi Mi 5 come with a 3,000 mAh battery. While the OnePlus 3 comes with Dash Charge 2.0 while the Mi 5 comes with Quick Charge 3.0. Mi 5 is the winner here with Qualcomm’s tried and tested technology.
The OnePlus 3 comes with a power-efficient Amoled screen while the Mi 5 comes with an underclocked processor. The contest between the two devices in terms of battery end with a tie.Pricing & Availability
The OnePlus 3 has been priced at Rs. 27,999. OnePlus has ditched its invite-only strategy and the device is available on Amazon India.Conclusion
However, in our overall testing and reviews, we found the OnePlus 3 to be better than the Xiaomi Mi 5. The core differences between the two phones are the cameras, the display size, display tech (AMOLED vs IPS), 6 GB RAM vs 3 GB and the internal storage type – UFS 2.0 in the OnePlus 3 vs standard eMMC flash in the Xiaomi Mi 5. While these may sound fairly trivial, the sum of these parts is greater than the price difference between the two phones.
In simpler words, the OnePlus 3 is a much better deal at a price of Rs. 27,999 compared to the Xiaomi Mi 5 at Rs. 24,999.
Update the detailed information about Beats Studio 3 Vs Sony Wh on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!