You are reading the article Avg Pc Tuneup Alternatives – Time To Switch Things Up A Little Bit updated in March 2024 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Avg Pc Tuneup Alternatives – Time To Switch Things Up A Little Bit
AVG PC Tuneup Alternatives – Time To Switch Things Up A Little Bit Best AVG PC Tuneup Alternatives –
Have a glance at some of the best PC optimizers and tuneup utilities for your Windows PC that could act as a replacement for AVG PC Tuneup –
1. Piriform CCleaner
CCleaner is hailed as not just one of the best PC cleaners around but it’s also a tuneup software that makes your computer run faster than before. All in all, the PC booster software offers fully automated maintenance for your PC.
Frees up RAM and increases PC boot time
Powerful privacy protection
Removal of internet trackers
Automatically updates apps to close any security loopholes
Disables unneeded programs and boosts startup speed
2. iObit Advanced SystemCare
Advanced SystemCare is one of the best PC tuneup software which deep cleans all kinds of junk files, unnecessary programs, invalid registry items, unwanted toolbars, and plugins. It doubles up as a PC optimizer that tweaks the settings of your PC for maximum performance.
Monitors system resources like disk usage, RAM, and CPU in real-time
One-stop solution for a variety of PC problems like registry errors, outdated drivers, system problems
Optimize internet browsing speed
Permanently get rid of unwanted files so much so, that they
Block any access to your personal data with Privacy Shield
3. Advanced PC Cleanup
There couldn’t have been an easier way to tuneup or clean your computer or see its speed skyrocket. With Advanced PC Cleanup you needn’t worry about what’s causing your computer to work slowly or what vulnerabilities can put your computer’s security at stake –
The AVG Tuneup alternative clears all kinds of trash from your computer
Helps you manage startup items
Removes spyware, adware, malware or any such infections
Efficiently deals with invalid registry items
Lets you uninstall redundant apps easily
Download Advanced PC Cleanup
4. Glary Utilities
Often touted as one of the best AVG PC Tuneup alternatives, this one tool has all that it takes to put PC errors in their place, prevent crashes and freezes and increase the speed of your PC. More specifically, this one utility has over 20 tools that can help your PC reach its maximum potential.
Intuitive design, fast scanning and comprehensive monitoring of system processes
20+ utilities to boost system performance
Repairs system files and registries which are otherwise hard to tackle
Easy system restore
Manages startup items to increase boot time
Download Glary Utilities
Also Read: Complete Review on GlarySoft Software Updater
5. Iolo System Mechanic
When complex system errors leave your PC sluggish and you at your wit’s end, time to bring in one of the best PC optimizers for Windows 10, iolo System Mechanic. And, it’s indeed an efficient mechanic for your PC.
It boosts speed by increasing the availability of RAM, CPU and other resources especially when you are using high-demand apps
Tweaks hidden internet settings of your PC so that you can browse the internet faster than ever
Fixes over 30000 issues, thanks to live updates from iolo Labs
Cleans PC even when it is idle
Eliminates more than 50 types of junk files
Download iolo System Mechanic
6. Ashampoo WinOptimizer
There are three fronts on which Ashampoo WinOptimizer works as an alternative to AVG PC Tuneup – PC cleaning, PC acceleration, and fixing common issues which are hampering your computer’s overall functionality. To efficiently tackle these fronts, this PC booster software is armed with several features some of which are mentioned below –
Superb analytical capabilities for determining HDD performance, system and processor benchmarks
Configure Windows 10 settings for supreme performance and create system restore points
Clean junk files not just from PC but even from your browser
Remove unnecessary auto-start items
Encrypt, delete and recover files with ease
Download Ashampoo WinOptimizer
7. Symantec Norton Utilities
Missing how your PC used to work when you got it just out of the box? Needn’t anymore. Symantec Norton Utilities is one of the best computer maintenance software which makes your computer run like new. And, how? Let’s dive into its magnificent features –
Rids your PC of issues responsible for crashes and shutdowns
Frees up hard drive space and thereby access to programs becomes much faster
Intelligently tracks unwanted login items and startup programs
Works in the background when your PC is idle
Download Symantec Norton Utilities
8. Wise Care 365 from WiseCleaner
Again, one of the best optimizers for your Windows PC, Wise Care 365 from WiseCleaner is one weapon armed with tools to tune-up, clean and monitor your PC and protect your system’s privacy. The PC booster software can easily be used by a beginner as well as an intermediate user.
You can customize clean-up items across 6 categories namely useless files, system tuneup, security projects, registry entries, computer traces and privacy traces
Fast scanning and quick cleanup of issues
Defrag disks and deal with invalid registries
You can schedule auto-cleaning
Prevent unwanted applications from adding to startup
Download WiseCleaner Wise Care 365
9. Auslogics BoostSpeed
What does it take to enhance your beloved system’s speed? Hours of tweaking necessary settings? deleting junk manually? No! All it takes is a PC booster software like Auslogics BoostSpeed. Why? Let’s have a look at some of its features –
Fix corrupt keys and invalid entries
Automated cleaning tasks to fix common PC issues
Customizable modes to optimize windows for best performance
Get rid of all kinds of PC junk
10. MacPaw CleanMyPC
Bewildered by what junk has eaten up the precious storage space of your computer? Or, where exactly are the useless files sitting? Time to count on a PC Tuneup software like CleanMyPC which is one of the best alternatives to AVG PC Tuneup.
Get rid of temp files, log files, cache, and other junk
Uninstall unwanted apps and even remove their remnants
Clear outdated registry entries
Sort autorun items
Cut down on extensions that you don’t use
Download MacPaw CleanMyPCWrapping Up
Best Tune-Up Utilities for Windows 10
Why Is It Important To Update Software For Windows Regularly?
Best Free Driver Updater Software For Windows
Solve The Issue Of Software Updates In Windows 10Quick Reaction:
About the author
You're reading Avg Pc Tuneup Alternatives – Time To Switch Things Up A Little Bit
Priced at just $199.99, the Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro are worthy options for Samsung-focused Android users who want a little bit of everything packed into their wireless earbuds, whether it’s attractive audio performance, excellent waterproofing, a comfortable fit, or active noise cancellation. With their unique voice detection feature and impressive waterproofing, they even manage to come out ahead of other earbuds aimed at a similarly wide market. Unfortunately, you’ll need to be fully committed to the Samsung ecosystem if you want to get the most out of them, but their versatility makes them a solid choice for anyone with an Android device.The right look
Ben Norris / IDG
And I do mean “perfect.” Whether I was jogging up San Francisco hills or playing tennis, they refused to budge and continued to feel comfortable despite not leaving my ears for a couple of hours. Most impressively, the Galaxy Buds Pro achieve this without stabilizing fins. Nor did I have to worry about them getting wet, thanks to their phenomenal IPX7 water-resistance rating. That not only keeps them safe from any sweat during a workout, but it also allowed me to keep them in while walking through a February rainstorm. That puts them way ahead of competing earbuds like the AirPods Pro and the Jabra Elite 85t, both of which only have an IPX4 rating.
The controls are comfortably familiar to anyone who’s used Samsung’s other earbuds: Tap once to play or pause a song, tap twice to skip to the next song, and tap three times to jump back to the previous song. In the Galaxy Wearable app, you can choose to tie the long press to the ambient mode, your choice of voice assistant, or the volume.
In practice, though, the controls could use some work. For instance, merely adjusting the buds themselves can be easily registered as a command to play or pause the music. And while the play/pause command works well enough, the double and triple taps frequently only register as single taps. It’s the most madding aspect of the Galaxy Buds Pro experience, and I was happy to see that the Galaxy Wearable app at least allows you to turn off touch controls altogether.Face the music
If there’s any single reason to buy these buds over other multi-featured wireless competitors, it’s the decently deep bass and clear treble they offer, thanks in part to the 11-millimeter woofer and 6.5mm tweeter in each bud. Take Fleetwood Mac’s “Dreams”—with the Galaxy Buds Pro, the well-known thumpin’ bassline still packs a punch without drowning out the clarity of Stevie Nicks’ vocals. The same goes for Billie Eilish’s “Bad Guy,” which sounds reasonably close to what I hear when I listen to it with some over-ear headphones. I soon found myself turning to the Galaxy Buds Pro just for the pleasure of listening to music through them.
The Galaxy Buds sound great straight out of the box (even on an iPhone, where they’re not supported by any software), but for the best experience, you should head to the Galaxy Wearable app and choose from one of the six preset options. Mind you, the experience isn’t universally satisfying: Some tracks have a tad too much brightness. Even so, the audio is far more smartly balanced than what I’m used to from earbuds, and I’d be happy if the Galaxy Buds Pro were the only buds I had for music.Half-canceled noise
It’s a good thing that the music quality is so remarkable, as it does a lot to make up for the Galaxy Buds Pro’s merely adequate active noise-canceling performance. The Buds Pro do a slightly better job of muffling the world around you than the Galaxy Buds Live, but you’re better off sticking with Sony’s WF-1000XM3 or Apple’s AirPods Pro if you’re in search of good ANC above all else. Samsung lets you switch between “high” and “low” ANC performance, but I tended to keep it on high as that was the only mode that adequately masked sounds like my desk fan,or passing cars outside my window, or even the wind. It’s strong enough that I could clearly tell the ANC was on, but not strong enough that I’d like to take them with me on an airplane. (Times being what they are, I didn’t have an opportunity to test this.)
Also impressive is the “voice detect” feature, which lowers the volume and switches from ANC to ambient mode when the Galaxy Buds Pro sense that you’re talking. The effect persists for around 10 seconds, which is usually enough to hear a reply from whoever you were speaking with. I wish more earbuds had this, as it’s one less reason to reach up and fiddle with the controls. And fortunately, you can disable voice detect in the Samsung Wearable app if you’re fond of singing along to your music.Battery
Ben Norris / IDG
Dropping them in the charging case nets you an extra 18 hours of play if you keep ANC active, while keeping it off boosts that number to 28 hours. The case itself is an adorably small, square thing that slipped neatly into my jeans pocket and supports both USB-C and Qi wireless charging.
No other Samsung earbuds include such an impressive collection of features in one package. Unfortunately, no other Samsung earbuds so fully push users into the Samsung ecosystem. If you’re an Android user who doesn’t have a Samsung phone, you won’t be able to use nifty features like the ability to automatically switch pairing from a Samsung phone to a Samsung tablet (depending on which one you’re using at a time). You also won’t be able to use hands-free voice-assistant activation with Bixby, although you can still use either Google Assistant or Alexa through the touch controls. Samsung even now has a quick-pairing feature that (greatly) resembles Apple’s. Just hold your Galaxy Buds Pro charging case near your Samsung phone with the lid open, and the prompt to pair them will immediately pop up.
The Galaxy Buds Pro also support Samsung’s 3D Audio feature, which riffs on the spatial audio Apple introduced for the AirPods Pro late last year. If you’re watching a film that supports Dolby surround sound, the Galaxy Buds Pro will recreate some of that experience through mere earbuds. Or so I hear. 3D Audio is only available on the Galaxy S21 and not on the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra used for this review. I don’t think this should dissuade anyone from buying these buds, but it’s a reminder that you’ll get the most out of them if you’re specifically a Samsung user.Bottom line
Apple already has one, Microsoft and Google say they’ll build one, Minnesota will demand it from next year and it could soon be the law in California and maybe nationwide. The smartphone kill switch appears to be on its way to every handset sold in the U.S. so what’s all the fuss about? Here’s a look at the main points of the technology.What is it?
The laws don’t target tablet PCs, basic cellphones or other devices will cellular connectivity.Why is it needed?
In the last few years, the number of violent thefts of smartphones on the streets of major U.S. cities has been rising. Some estimates say 1 in 3 thefts in the U.S. involve a smartphone. Thieves snatch phones from the hands of victims as they walk down the street or sit on public transport and then dart away. A sizeable portion of crimes involve people being threatened with knives or guns, or victims are assaulted.
Police believe that if phones can be disabled, they’ll become much less valuable on the secondhand market and the incentive for theft will drop considerably.How will it work?
If your phone is stolen, you or someone you have authorized will be able to call your carrier or use a website to send a “kill” signal to your phone. That signal will lock the device and, if you choose, will also delete personal data. The kill switch will “render the device inoperable on the network of any provider of commercial mobile service or commercial mobile data service globally, even if the device is turned off or has the data storage medium removed,” according to the federal proposal.
The only way to revive a locked phone will be with a password supplied by the phone’s owner.When will it begin?
In Minnesota, the software must be installed or available for download, in California it will have to be preinstalled on new devices.How much will it cost? Do I have to have it on my phone?
No. Minnesota’s law says it should be installed or available for download. California is mandating the software be on new phones but users will have the ability to disable the feature, but it must be enabled by default. By having it opt-out rather than opt-in, law enforcement believes many more people will leave it switched on and so the chance that any given smartphone will be protected will be much higher.What about Find My iPhone or Google’s Android locator?
Built-in tracking services can help locate a phone and wipe its memory if the phone remains online, but all too often thieves switch off a stolen phone and reinstall the operating system. That wipes all personal information on the phone and your link to it. California’s proposed law says the kill-switch software must be resistant to such OS reinstalls.What’s the industry doing?
For a long time, the telecoms industry was against the idea of a kill switch. Speaking through its lobbying organization, the CTIA, the industry said a kill switch would make phones vulnerable to hacking. But earlier this year, as legislation looked more and more likely, that stance changed and the CTIA now supports a kill switch.
But the industry is hoping to avoid legislation and make it a voluntary commitment. Previously, it launched a database of stolen phones that could be used to prevent them from being reused with new accounts. However, the database has limited reach outside of the U.S. and many stolen phones are sent overseas.Will it work?
But it’s safe to say a kill switch won’t do anything to encourage smartphone theft.So, can the government kill my smartphone?
California’s proposed law is the only one that specifically addresses this issue. It allows police access to the tool but under the conditions of the existing section 7908 of the California Public Utilities Code. That gives police the ability to cut off phone service in certain situations.
A court order is typically required, although an exception is made in an emergency that poses “immediate danger of death or great bodily injury.”
There is only one year left before Universal Analytics goes away. So what is going to happen to our data? What is the best migration plan?
There is no doubt that these burning questions have been raised by everyone who is using this tool. With Google deciding to sunset Universal Analytics, many people are wondering what the next step is.
🚨 Note: If you need to make your quick analytics health check, have a look at our GA4 Audit guide.
We heard you and decided to address this dramatic change by talking to industry professionals and asking their opinion on it.
Should you switch to Google Analytics 4? Read on and find out!
So we have asked our experts the following questions:
Undoubtedly, migration is a complex process and should be planned carefully. Therefore, dual tagging is still a common trend.
I’ve been using GA4 as the primary tool for only a few clients so far.
Pitfalls are primarily around confusion about dimensions and reporting interface that need to be better understood before being useful.
Dana DiTomaso from Kick Point: “We are already using GA4 with clients but not always as the main tool depending on a few factors”
We are already using GA4 with clients but not always as the main tool depending on a few factors.
If they are brand new and don’t have overly complex analytics requirements, then GA4 is their primary analytics source, with reports in Google Data Studio.
If they have years of data in GA Universal, we are typically still using that for primary analysis, but the flexibility of events in GA4 means that sometimes we have a hybrid approach.
For example, if we want to capture more parameters in an event than the Universal category/action/label hierarchy would allow for, we’ll use GA4 to report on that event specifically.
That being said, all data is still presented in Google Data Studio to clients, so they don’t need to be flipping between two versions of GA.
Yehoshua Coren from Analytics Ninja: ”We aren’t using the interface at all, just BigQuery”
For the most part, no, we aren’t using GA4 with clients as the main tool. We have one client for whom GA4 is the primary tool for data collection, but we aren’t using the interface at all, just BigQuery.
Some of the reporting capabilities within Explorations are pretty good, but the product isn’t ready yet to replace the very comfortable reporting that most clients are used to in Universal Analytics.
BigQuery. Though the 1M events per day limit for non-GA360 clients is pretty limiting
Funnel Exploration is done nicely
Ability to have both App and Web data modelled consistently in a single location is a benefit
More robust segmentation engine compared to Universal Analytics
Reporting interface crashes pretty often (for larger data sets)
Identity resolution is sub-par (no visitor stitching, logged in users ‘change’ primary IDs mid-session)
Differences between attribution and sessionization compared to Universal Analytics make reporting differences very confusing to end users
Standard reports are much less useful than Universal Analytics’
Pathing report doesn’t let users choose their own nodes
VERY strict and asinine data collection limits. Such as character limits on user properties and event parameters. Even the ‘page_location’ dimension is truncated after 300 characters
Fred Pike from Northwoods: “I am absolutely sold on GA4 as the future”
I am still double-tagging. I’ve not moved any client to GA4 100% yet.
I’ve worked on two large-ish website relaunches recently and have done the side-by-side mapping of the user interactions we want to track.
In GA3, of course, I’m still having to stuff two or sometimes three fields into the event label or, sometimes, the event action.
YouTube tracking is a perfect example, where the event label usually has the video title, the YT URL, and, sometimes, the page the video was on.
Put that GA3 field-stuffing next to GA4 and it becomes immediately obvious how great the GA4 data model is.
I love the event-driven approach and love love love having enough parameters to handle all the data points I want to track. (At least so far!) So I am absolutely sold on GA4 as the future.
I am not a fan of the UI and I hate the limitations in the Explore report writer. But I think the data model, and knowing you’ll do much of your analysis outside of GA4, makes it viable.
I am also conscious of the 50 custom dimensions limitation (120 in the paid version), so I’ve started using three generic parameters: type, sub_type, text.
These are broadly applicable to a large number of GA4 events and, as long as you’re using them similarly across all instances, you don’t have to create a bunch of custom dimensions.
Peter O’Neill from ZHS Orchards: “GA4 configuration options are mixed, some very powerful and some missing”
We are collecting data in GA4 but not using it yet.
I think the data collection is fine, although it would be good to have nested variables (I don’t think this is available, not that close to it). The logic matches what I used for data layer structure so no issues there.
Accessing the data via BigQuery is fine, for the companies with people that can do this.
GA4 configuration options are mixed, some very powerful and some missing. Crazy that event names don’t allow spaces, the tool was created by a developer for themselves with no awareness of the actual users.
Until the non-analysts in an organisation can use a digital analytics tool, it is not good enough. GA4 currently fails.
Miroslav Varga from Escape Ltd: “GA4 is Google’s solution and you have to take it seriously, no matter about your personal attitude”
GA4 is Google’s solution and you have to take it seriously, no matter about your personal attitude. But our clients are not very excited to switch to GA4.
They treat it as a beta tool and don’t like to invest too much time-effort-money towards the migration. By default, we install both properties, but they don’t use GA4 as much as they use GA3.
There is also the trouble with GDPR and problems of transferring PII data outside the EU (DPA’s in Austria, Germany, and France already have verdicts in that sense). GA4 is still to come.
Stockton Fisher from Greater Than Marketing: “I am very excited about the future of Google Analytics”
We are not using GA4 as the main reporting tool quite yet for any clients. Although we have it fully set up, it hasn’t taken its place as the main source of data.
However, there are many things it does do really well and we do use it for. For example, the explorations are a quick and easy way to find some specific answers. The BigQuery export is a welcome integration that allows us to create custom tables combining data from GA and other sources.
Overall, I like the new data models and how it uses events for everything, I think that is much more flexible. However, it is more complex to get started with so that’s the biggest con for new people trying to break into the platform.
I love where it’s going, I am very excited about the future of Google Analytics. There are just a few more functionalities they need to build still to make it #1 for me.
Mike Rhodes from WebSavvy: “I can understand why Google needs to make the switch, but I wish they’d find a way to allow businesses to view historic data for a lot longer than seems likely”
We’re not yet using it with the majority of clients as their main analytics tool. But we have installed it in parallel with UA for clients that were willing to test it early & start gathering data.
The main problems have been the learning curve needed – both by us & the client – to understand the new reports & make the mental switch to the new event-based model.
Clients inevitably want to see ‘the new version of’ a particular report which hasn’t always been easy for us to create.
As such we haven’t yet used GA4 data in our GDS reports, those are still mostly driven by the Performance platforms with some UA data as needed.
I can understand why Google needs to make the switch, but I wish they’d find a way to allow businesses to view historic data for a lot longer than seems likely.
But we’re excited to see the predictive metrics & the fact that less data will be omitted (although I’d love more transparency about ‘modelled conversions’!)
All in all, it’s a chance we’ll embrace!
Some companies have started early migration to quickly adjust to the changes.
Zorin Radovancevic from Escape Ltd: “What most people forget though is the additional reporting suite in GA4 found under Explore which is much more powerful than any reporting feature inside the old Google Analytics Universal”
In some cases, GA4 is the primary tool for analytics – mostly for clients which are APP first in their approach as they are already used to the Firebase model and reporting.
1) RAW data access with the BQ export which gives us the ability easily enrich the data set for further use cases and a very flexible event model with the increased schema for custom dimensions and metrics even in the free version.
2) The process of (re)evaluating Analytics efforts in terms of what do we even need to port to a new solution is a good exercise and with the soon to be deprecated universal it just speeds up the process.
3) Machine learning in the backend exposed as reporting utilities (likelihood and anomalies) with the addition of Consent mode which even in beta allows for additional conversion and behaviour modelling in the future more regulated digital presence.
Documentation – it just needs to be brought to a decent level. For instance Measurement protocol (alpha/beta) and parameter reference is quite thin and in more mature implementations and use cases it is quite essential.
Feature parity with Google Analytics Universal – still not there and this should be the sole focus of further product development.
I have no doubt that GA4 will be accepted soon by the wider community but I also feel that GA will potentially lose a part of the customer base which needs a less complex preset tool which GA4 is not and will not be at least in the short term.
What differentiates Google from the other vendors is its built-in ability to quickly integrate with the entire Google stack and this will be a very heavy argument in any alternative finding process.
Moreover, the GA community will recover once enough How to articles become available for the current lacking easy-to-use reporting and implementation concepts.
Fortunately enough we have started with GA4 in its infancy and we have seen how it progressed so my view is optimistic.
Such significant changes cast doubts on the credibility of Google Analytics. As a result, different alternative tracking tools might be taken into consideration.
Gerry White from Rise at Seven: “The question for many businesses is are they prepared to rethink their metrics and re-configure something when the older version of analytics had been tuned and the teams had been trained?”
Google is sunsetting GA3 far too quickly, this isn’t a GA4 bashing thing it is simply that far too many larger businesses will need longer to transition, especially as the metrics are not one to one.
GA4 has a very different way of looking at the world and it is far more focused on users rather than sessions, it has taken me a little bit of time to understand what and where some of the data is, often a report you rely on in GA3 is simply not there but can be rebuilt.
The question for many businesses is are they prepared to rethink their metrics and re-configure something when the older version of analytics had been tuned and the teams had been trained?
The other question that is starting to pop up now is that this sudden, forced change is starting to make us question if Google is the right company to trust? Should we be investing into something like SnowPlow?
Sadly this isn’t as easy as it sounds for companies below enterprise level unless we start to see more analysts develop the ability to maintain and offer alternatives as solutions.
When it comes to GA4 migration, another important issue must be addressed: product knowledge gaps and the quickest ways to bridge them.
It is crucial to understand how the data is going to be analyzed and visualized and if this can be leveraged on your own without any external support.
Paul Koks from Online Metrics: “For clients mainly using the GA3 reporting UI for reporting/analysis, GA4 is really a pain – training of internal teams is important/required”
Here are some thoughts/observations:
For the majority of clients, GA3 is still the main tool in use. We have set up GA3 and GA4 in parallel and do a lot of extra customizations in the next few months and some probably later this year.
GA4 is still under heavy development (I feel) and not yet up to par with GA3. Should be much better at the end of 2023. Another challenge is that things are changing often (i.e. interface, list of standard dimensions, channel definitions) which requires (new) changes in the setup. For clients mainly using the GA3 reporting UI for reporting/analysis, GA4 is really a pain – training of internal teams is important/required.
Despite some remarkable improvements, the new reporting model can throw GA4 viability into question.
Brian Clifton from Verified Data: “To mitigate the issues, we are encouraging clients to use Data Studio as their reporting interface instead”
For implementation, the new data model is a huge improvement, particularly for enterprise users. For example, it provides a lot more flexibility with every data point now allowing for up to 25 associated parameters.
In addition, removing the free limit of 10M hits/month is a big plus, though it does mean considerably more planning and thought is required for the data structure from the get-go. That’s because if more than 50 custom dimensions are required (still a very generous allowance), you need to move to the paid/360 product.
Having said that, encouraging a well-thought-out plan for your data structure is a good thing, which is lacking with the “catch-all” approach of Universal Analytics.
However, I have to say the user experience of finding data and assessing reports is very poor in GA4. It’s as if the product has been built “by developers for developers”, with little consideration given to how existing users assess their website and marketing performance.
To mitigate the issues, we are encouraging clients to use Data Studio as their reporting interface instead. Maybe it is Google’s intention to focus on data collection and less on reporting, though it is an odd way to go about it.
Some experts tend to believe that these are not pitfalls yet new challenges we would have to face, as new technologies are being developed, and it is fundamental to make a mental shift as well.
We do have clients using GA4, besides some of the predictive metrics and automated insights that Google has deployed in GA4 we’ve found that clients are liking the following in GA:
Pathing and Funnels reporting is better
Combining dimensions and metrics can be a bit easier (clients sometimes struggled with mixing scoped dimensions in reporting resulting in odd or unexpected results)
The simplified data model has made reporting easier for some clients
The ability to build a left nav that is tailored to an organization’s needs instead of a standard reporting suite. We’ve had challenges in the past because there are reports available in UA that either don’t meet business needs or are for features that are not used causing confusion and frustrations for end users
eCommerce metrics are no longer session bound. If I view a product and add it to my cart but then stop for lunch and come back and buy in the afternoon reporting for that would show abandonment in the morning session and conversion in the afternoon in UA so EE reporting was a bit awkward. In GA4, with the removal of session-based data, I can now see a more accurate picture of eCommerce behavior using Funnel Reports
Elapsed time is greatly improved
Real-time debugging is much easier
Consent mode. This is one that is currently of more value for our European clients but with the changing landscape for consent and privacy, GA4 will be better positioned with more granular data controls to manage how data is collected and used
I would not call these pitfalls but more challenges some clients are facing in the transition to GA4:
The deprecation of sessions. Almost all of our clients have built their KPIs around Sessions so moving to User in GA4 is challenging. Especially for clients that were using Landing Page, Exit Page, eCommerce Conversion Rate and other Session scoped Dimensions and Metrics
Sessions and Users are calculated differently. Hit/Event scoped is really the only place you can expect parity between UA and GA4 so we’ve been encouraging our clients to dual tag so they can start understanding what the difference is for these numbers
The mental shift from Category, Action, and Label to Event Name and Parameters. We’ve been having to do a lot of assisting and educating around this to help clients start to make the shift. A lot of our clients depend on a generic event dataLayer push method in GTM with Category, Action, and Label as parameters. We’ve had to assist a number of clients to determine how to bridge that gap to a GA4 friendly Event Name and Parameters to minimize the need to involve developers to update their dataLayer in the near term. (We don’t have any clients that don’t use a TMS but I imagine this becomes even more difficult if they use hard-coded UA. Even more so if they are still using chúng tôi and have not moved to gtag.)
No views. We’ve had some clients find challenges in moving to a GA structure that doesn’t allow for the filtering and manipulation that UA provided with views
In Tag Manager Italia we implement and manage GA4 along with Google Universal Analytics with our clients since October 2023, when the E-commerce tracking in GA4 was officially released.
Thanks to a fully customizable Data model it is possible to manage the user tracking by adopting your own data structure, without the need of relying on the standard data structure given by Universal Analytics
Ease of implementation: in GA4 everything is well defined as event nomenclature and parameters. This way, the implementation of push commands in the Google Tag Manager dataLayer is easier for the development team
Audience and Conversion management: in GA4 barely everyone can easily create audiences based on events and parameters. Moreover, conversions simply rely on deciding which events correspond to which conversions
In GA4 we can now count on more detailed and realistic dimensions and metrics that definitively give more actionable insights (e.g.: ga_session_id, ga_session_number, engagement_time_msec, user_engagement, etc..)
Even the E-commerce tracking is more complete and specific thanks to tons of new events and parameters for better analysis, planning, and optimizing digital marketing campaigns
The Explore Report offers the possibility to make in-depth and more granular data analysis. In particular, the Funnel Exploration Report allows us to use the Show Elapsed Time among the various funnel steps
The GA4 DebugView is the feature we were all waiting for, to verify that the tracking implementation is “error-free”
In order to use GA4 at full power, it’s mandatory to create a measurement plan as the first thing first in your digital analytics strategy. Implementing digital marketing and digital analytics strategies without a measurement plan is a big mistake because you risk losing track of the purpose of the tracking events you implemented. Furthermore, without a measurement plan, the possibility of making tracking errors and making wrong decisions becomes higher
GA4 is definitely a good product with great potential, but there are still a lot of things to improve.
Here are the main GA4 pitfalls and a shortlist of things that should be fixed:
Custom Channel Grouping: in the current state it is impossible to create your own channel grouping. (This feature is in the roadmap)
Thresholding: if Google Signal is applied, even in standard reports you will have problems seeing the real metrics. In order to overcome this problem, you have to use BigQuery. GA4 refers to “unsampling” data, but this applies only to standard reports. In any case, the “unsampling” data are bound by Thresholding
Reports are not user-friendly (including the Explore section). For example, you can’t resize the columns of the reports. Sometimes the size of the report is too invasive and the screen space seems to be never enough to have a full report overview
The Realtime Report – in its current state – doesn’t allow to have a clear and immediate “picture” of the situation (at least, not like the “old” Universal Analytics)
The 24h wait to see data is quite annoying, but we have to get used to it
Data Filters based on IP addresses: from my point of view, this is a completely useless function. It is more convenient to manage filters with other parameters and not with the IP address
The GA4 data stream can be linked to multiple domains, but a Search Console account can only be linked to one property. This is a limit that can be overcome only by using the paid version of Google Analytics 360
Other nice features that are in the official roadmap will arrive soon.
Here are the most awaited ones:
Session scope e product scope
In conclusion, GA4 is a completely different “tool” from Google Universal Analytics you used to work with.FAQ Are there any concerns or challenges related to the migration process to GA4?
Yes, there are concerns about the migration process, including the need for reconfiguring metrics and reporting, the learning curve for understanding the new event-based model, and the limitations of the GA4 user interface.Is GA4 recommended for all businesses, or are there specific cases where it may be more suitable?
The suitability of GA4 depends on the specific needs and circumstances of each business. Some experts mention that GA4 may be more suitable for businesses with an app-first approach or those already familiar with the Firebase model and reporting.What are the main concerns regarding GA4 according to the experts?
The main concerns regarding GA4 mentioned by the experts include the UI and reporting limitations compared to Universal Analytics, documentation gaps, changes in naming and concepts of dimensions and metrics, and the need for feature parity with Universal Analytics.Summary
To sum up, the sunset of Universal Analytics has prepared some significant challenges for us. New changes are awaiting us in the nearest future, and we should be ready to face them with solid knowledge and newly gained skills.
We hope this knowledge-share post has shed some light on the current situation and inspired you to look for the optimal GA4 solution.
If you’ve decided to upgrade to Google Analytics 4, check out our handy guide and learn how!
Check out our comparison of Google Search Console vs Google Analytics 4 and find out where lies their strength!
Have you found yourself in a situation where you are invited to an event or meeting on Google Calendar but may not be able to attend the meeting at the scheduled time? Fortunately for you, Google Calendar has a feature that lets you suggest a new time to the meeting organizer that suits your schedule and if the organizer is okay with it, you can attend it at your proposed time.
In this post, we’ll help you learn you can suggest a new time for an event or meeting inside Google Calendar, how you can review them as an organizer and what happens when you send a time proposal.
Related: How to Get Google Calendar Widget on iOS 14
Can you suggest a new time in Google Calendar?
Yes. Google allows you to suggest a new time for a meeting you’re invited making meeting scheduling more efficient. Suggesting a new meeting time in Google Calendar is a means to minimize the time spent on meeting practicalities, enhances the communication between meeting attendees, and also improves the productivity of the meeting.
Who can propose a new time in Google Calendar?
If you wish to propose a new time in Google Calendar, you should know who can actually perform the action.
All guests can propose a new time of their choice.
Meeting organizers don’t have the means to propose a new time.
Large meetings with over 200 guests and all-day events don’t have the Time Proposal feature.
How to propose a new time on PC (Web)
After this, select a new time you want to propose.
Next, select a new date for the meeting, if required.
Make the necessary changes to the meeting’s time when the Calendar invite page opens up. That’s all.
How to propose a new time on phone
If you’re using Google Calendar on your phone, you will also be able to propose a new time for an invited event/meeting. You can do so by opening the Google Calendar app on your smartphone and select the event you’re invited to.
Inside the invite screen, tap on the ‘Up arrow’ adjacent to the ‘Maybe’ option.
Tap on the ‘Propose a new time’ option at the bottom of the screen.
You will now be taken to the ‘Propose a new time’ screen inside Google Calendar where you will be able to see the original event start and end times. You can modify each of them by tapping on the date and time and choosing a new time for the event.
After you’re done selecting a date and time for proposing, tap on the Send icon (the one with a right arrow inside a blue bubble) at the bottom. You will be asked to confirm your RSVP which you can do by selecting one of the three options – Yes, No, or Maybe and then tap on ‘Save’ to send your proposed time to the organizer.
The event organizer will now be alerted of the proposed time you sent.
How to review a proposed time as an organizer
If you’re the organizer of an event created on Google Calendar, all meeting guests will be able to send you their proposed time, provided the meeting isn’t beg attended by over 200 people.
On PC (Web)
To take a look at a proposed time for a Calendar event, go to the Google Calendar home page and you will be notified straight away that there’s a new time proposal and the event invite will open up on its own. If not, select the event from your Google Calendar home page.
However, you can modify the event time that suits you and the attendees by setting a modified time of your choice below the event title. You can then proceed to save the changes and make sure the attendees are notified of the change by confirming to send Update emails to the guests in question.
You can also review a proposed time for a Calendar invite using your phone. To do that, open the Google Calendar app on your phone, select the event you created for later. If someone has sent a time proposal, a tiny clock icon will appear inside the event box.
After you open the event screen, you will be able to see the proposed time and the attendee’s name who sent you the proposal. To review their proposal, tap on the ‘Review proposed time’ option.
What happens when you propose new time?
When you’re a guest to a meeting you’re invited through Google Calendar, you can propose a new time for the meeting to commence if the stipulated time isn’t feasible for you. Upon suggesting a new time, all organizers of the meeting will receive email notifications for proposals made by guests for an event.
Organizers can choose to accept the newly proposed time or ignore it if they wish to keep the event or meeting set at the original date and time.
How will you know whether it was accepted or not
Since it’s up to the organizers to decide whether they want to accept your reject your proposed time, you will only get a confirmation when your proposed time is accepted.
If an organizer chooses to accept your proposed time or modify it any other way, you will receive an email invite with the new event time and you can confirm your RSVP for the newly proposed event directly from Gmail or Google Calendar.
Best Microsoft Office Alternatives for PC in 2023?
NOTE: Changing suites can be a bit of hassle as files created on one suite may pose problems. Because very often, the files created on one suite don’t look as good and refined on another suite; they editing you did on one suite may not work on another, etc. Everything is fine if you are using an office suite just for yourself and you don’t have to export the files to anyone. However, if you work in collaboration, you have to consider what your colleagues use. Though this problem isn’t pervasive, it is an important thing to consider.Best Microsoft Office Alternatives 2023 1. LibreOffice
Compatible with most file formats
Much more toolbar options than Microsoft Office
Tons of available Add-ons
Misses a few features
MS Office customized files may not look the same when imported
No Cloud Storage options
Because LibreOffice is a Free-to-use tool with an equally productive interface and working style. In some ways, it even surpasses Microsoft Office in the game of functionality such as it supports many more formats than Microsoft Office does. Though it lacks some of the features, there are tons of add-ons available that can make up for it. Hence, LibreOffice is an amazing tool and a great alternative to Microsoft Office.
Though it offers all the similar functionality, it lacks the elegance and charm of Microsoft Office. Apart from this, you can’t edit files on LibreOffice with your mobile device because it only allows you to read documents on its mobile app. Also, it doesn’t offer a cloud storage to save documents.
Microsoft Office vs LibreOffice (Verdict)
LibreOffice is a free-to-use tool unlike Microsoft Office which you have to pay for. Though Microsoft Office looks elegant, LibreOffice doesn’t leave behind any feature that you may require. Also, you can save files on OneDrive and Google Drive to make for missing cloud storage features.
In short, the only reason to ignore LibreOffice would be your comfort with Microsoft or your need of collaboration with other people who use MS Office.
Download: LibreOffice2. WPS Office
Available for all operating Systems
High Compatibility with MS Office
Supports multiple file formats
Has a dedicated PDF Reader
I can’t help but say it is near perfect
Why WPS Office?
WPS Office is a great free to use tool. It is available for all your devices be it Mac, Windows, Android, or iOS. There is also a web-based version available for WPS Office where you can create files and collaborate with others in real-time. It also offers cloud storage to help you save your documents and use them anywhere. WPS Office has great compatibility with Microsoft Office and Google Docs and Sheets. WPS Office is the true alternative to Microsoft office available in the market.
WPS Office is the worthy competitor of Microsoft Office. It lacks a few features that Microsoft Office holds. The smart art in Microsoft Office is a tad bit better than WPS Office.
WPS Office vs Microsoft Office
WPS Office is a free software and lacks just a couple of features that you may never notice. It offers great functionality and interface. The application is pretty lightweight on all the operating systems.
On the other hand, Microsoft Office is a tad bit better in functionality than WPS Office. Also, OneDrive offers 5GBs free space instead of just 1GB in WPS Office.
Download: WPS Office3. Google Office Suite:
Free of Cost
All you need is a working Internet Connection
Tons of Features
Great for Students and people who don’t require much customization
Files can be exported in multiple formats
It uses the widely used file extensions that can be used with all variety of Office suites
Lacks the features of an Installed Suite
Offline Editing requires a browser Plug-in
Only the files saved in drive can be edited offline
Why Google Office Suite Apps?
Also, because it is a cloud-based platform, it is easier to collaborate with people on the same document at the same time which can be pretty useful for small businesses.
Why not Google Office Suite Apps?
Google Office apps like Google Docs, Google Sheet, and Google Slide aren’t as powerful as Microsoft Office Suite installed on your Desktop. Though the online version Microsoft Office Apps aren’t any better than Google Apps, you have the option to customize your files later in the Desktop app with Microsoft.
I too use Google Docs for collaborating on blogs and I have to use MS office on my PC often for the customization.
MS Office Suite vs Google Suite (Verdict)
If you require productivity tools for basic purposes and don’t require heavy customization, there is hardly any office suite better than Google.
However, for creatives, MS Office would be the Right choice.4. FreeOffice:
Supports a lot of File Formats
Easy Toggling between Ribbon mode and classic mode
Touch Screen Compatibility
No Cloud Storage
Not available for Mac
FreeOffice has both paid and free versions. FreeOffice holds all the functionality a user would require from an office suite and supports a large number of file formats including that of Microsoft Office. It features all the necessary customization options. It also offers some amazing perks such as availability of Touch mode. Touch Mode helps make the interface more usable for touch enabled devices. FreeOffice also allows you to make all the basic changes to your document with the Android version of it. Hence, it is a marvelous alternative to Microsoft Office.
FreeOffice offers a lot of features in the free version but has reserved some of the useful features for its premium users (Paid). Also, it doesn’t feature a cloud storage which is one of the essentials for people who work in collaboration.
FreeOffice vs Microsoft Office (Verdict)
However, more people would ignore it than not. Absence of Cloud storage renders it useless for anyone looking to work in collaboration. Also, add-ons and plug-ins aren’t easily available for any feature it misses.
Download: FreeOffice5. Apache OpenOffice
Dedicated Extension store
Supports over 40 Languages
A lot of built-in templates
No application for Mobile Devices
Interface is bit outdated
No Cloud Storage
Why Apache OpenOffice?
Apache OpenOffice is free to use unlike Microsoft Office which you have to pay for. Apache OpenOffice holds all the features a user would require. Even if a user feels the need of a functionality, it has its own dedicated extension store for different add-ons which can add to its functionality.
Apache OpenOffice looks outdated when compared with its very polished and elegant competitor. Also, it doesn’t offer cloud storage which renders it useless for people who work in collaboration.
Apache OpenOffice vs Microsoft Office
Apache OpenOffice offers all the functionality a user would require for free. It has its dedicated extension to add more functionality to the app. However, it doesn’t feel as crisp as Microsoft Office. If a polished looking user interface is what you need, OpenOffice isn’t the right alternative. However, if you are looking for the functionality and want to work on some project which you don’t have to collaborate for, OpenOffice can be a great tool.
Download: Apache OpenOffice
So, this was our list of Best Microsoft Office alternatives available in the market. Do let us know your experience if you have tried any of these.
How to Fix Microsoft Office Activation Errors
All You Need to Know About Microsoft Office Picture ManagerQuick Reaction:
About the author
Update the detailed information about Avg Pc Tuneup Alternatives – Time To Switch Things Up A Little Bit on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!