Trending February 2024 # A Test Plan Tool For Simpler Test Case Management # Suggested March 2024 # Top 5 Popular

You are reading the article A Test Plan Tool For Simpler Test Case Management updated in February 2024 on the website Bellydancehcm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 A Test Plan Tool For Simpler Test Case Management

Vincent Kurutza Head of QA

Our QA team was lacking the time to write proper regression tests. We already had a much more complex and expensive tool which we never used. Then we gave Testpad a trial and the results were great.

Testpad customer for 6 years

Luke Hefson Engineering Manager

Testpad has really made writing test plans a breeze for our team. It helps us to dive into our tests, isolate defects, and provide context around the results.

Testpad customer for 9 years

Eric Wolf Senior Solutions Architect

We use Testpad to track all of our testing. It offers the depth and flexibility to model our entire test plan, but remains simple enough that onboarding new testers is effortless. The import and export facilities are really helpful for migrating test plans from other test management tools.

Testpad customer for 7 years

Jason Pritchard QA Engineer

Testpad is great! We use it every day testing embedded software, making light work of our many environments and configurations. I haven’t tried every QA tool out there but if I had the choice, I’d choose Testpad 10/10 times.

Testpad customer for 5 years

Stewart Warner Managing Director, Foxhole QA

Testpad customer for 4 years

Jason Hamilton Founder and CEO

Testpad is flexible enough to create and reuse test plans lightning fast. This helps our team spend more time preparing to test, do the actual testing and report the final results.

Testpad customer for 8 years

Brian Grau Head of Production

Testpad allows for rapid testing to fix issues in our software before it reaches our customers. The simplicity makes the testing process straight forward, gets the results to the engineering team, and is fun for the tester.

Testpad customer for 8 years

Nick Kenyon Head of Operations

Testpad customer for 11 years

Ashleigh Lodge Dev Team Lead

We couldn’t have ramped up our development schedule without Testpad. It’s a core part of our QA and the Testpad team are exceptionally responsive.

Testpad customer for 9 years

Adrian Wright Business Process and IT Strategy

I was looking at 16 different tools before I stumbled across Testpad. It’s simple and quick to use (easy enough to have business people use it with very little training). Reporting is simple and effective, making it clear who has tested what, where the bottlenecks are, and how much you still have left to do. Take a look – highly recommended.

Testpad customer for 11 years

Mike Andrews QA Manager

Testpad has become a core tool for our QA team. We’re expanding this year and will continue to use and support Testpad. We love it.

Testpad customer for 7 years

Phillip Cave VP Product Development

We rely on Testpad to help us organize our test plans and help coordinate testing between multiple people within our organization. Testpad is a valued part our release testing process at Jackson River.

Testpad customer for 10 years

Stephen Stillings Lead QA Engineer

Testpad is a crucial part of our QA toolset. The flexibility of Testpad allows us to rapidly document and execute tests and the reporting capabilities are simple yet detailed and informative. Testpad is swiftly becoming our default test management tool.

Testpad customer for 6 years

Anastasia Lutsenko Senior Tester

Great test tool! Simple and usable, it makes tester’s life easier and more productive.

Testpad customer for 10 years

You're reading A Test Plan Tool For Simpler Test Case Management

Oneplus 6 Performance Test: Packs A Mean Punch

One thing that OnePlus has always gotten right with its smartphones is performance. I have been using OnePlus devices since the OnePlus 3 and I have never suffered any lag or stutter, even after using the devices for over more than a year. In fact, my original OnePlus 3 is still going strong even after being my daily driver for the last two years. So, it came as a no surprise when I tested the OnePlus 6 and it handled everything that I threw at it with quite an ease. In a time where the prices of flagship devices are touching $1000 mark, OnePlus has managed to provide impeccable performance at its killer price. In this article, we are going to take a look at OnePlus’ latest device, the OnePlus 6, and find out if and how it manages to push the bar even further as we put it through our performance test:

OnePlus 6: The Specs

The OnePlus 6 packs the top of the line hardware which provides it with enough capabilities to scream through any task that you want it to handle. For those who are interested in numbers, the OnePlus 6 brings the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor which is an octa-core processor with 4 high-performance cores clocked at 2.8 GHz and 4 energy efficient cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. OnePlus 6 pairs this chipset with Adreno 630 GPU, 6 GB of super-fast LPDDR4X RAM, and 64 GB of UFS 2.1 2-Lane storage which brings lightning fast file transfer speeds.

OnePlus 6 Performance Test: Oxygen OS

OnePlus 6 Performance Test: Benchmarks

While synthetic benchmarks never tell the whole story, they do paint a picture of the performance that you can expect from the device. We tested the OnePlus 6 on both Geekbench and AnTuTu and as expected, the OnePlus 6 scored at the top of the chart. You can see the scores in the picture below.

OnePlus 6 Performance Test: Real World Performance

Honestly, as you can infer from the title of this post, the OnePlus 6 is a beast. The performance is so good that the phone just fades into the background and feels more like a portal for getting things done. Day-to-day tasks are handled in seconds and even playing major gaming titles such as PUBG mobile, Marvel Future Fight, and Asphalt 8, feels like a breeze. I tried really hard to make the OnePlus 6 miss one frame or show some lag, even for a second, but I failed. The OnePlus 6 gives one of the smoothest smartphone performance I have ever experienced.

Buy From Amazon: starts at ₹34,999

SEE ALSO: OnePlus 6 vs Honor 10: Quick Comparison

OnePlus 6 Performance Test: It Flies High

OnePlus smartphones have always delivered when it comes to performance, and the OnePlus 6 is the best performing smartphone from the OnePlus till date. Considering the OnePlus 6’s top of the line specs and nimble software, it was no surprise. If you are buying this phone, know that you are getting a lightning fast smartphone which is never going to disappoint you.

Choose The Right Business Continuity Test For You For 2023

Businesses today need to be ready for unexpected impacts on their business. Business Continuity Plans are a great way to prepare for unexpected events. They consolidate everything you need to do in the event of a disruption to your business. However, any Business Continuity Plan must be regularly tested to make sure it is fit for purpose.

We will be discussing what a Business Continuity Plan looks like, how testing works, and when it should be tested.

What is a Business Continuity Plan (BCP)?

The Business Continuity Plan explains how a business functions after a disaster. It provides procedures for dealing with fires, natural disasters and mass disease outbreaks.

Data backups are a key concern for today’s plans. Many industries, such as content marketing for SaaS, require extensive planning. We need to be aware of our protected data. The plan must also include contact information for staff to ensure productivity, whether it is short-term or long term.

Also read: Top 10 Helpful GitHub Storage For Web Developers

What Business Continuity Plan do I need?

The past few years have shown that no one can predict the future. Unexpected events can cause major disruptions in our lives and can lead to businesses being shut down or even going out of business.

Invenio IT found that 51% of global businesses didn’t have a business continuity program in 2023. This is a mistake we simply can’t afford, given how rapidly the world of work has changed. If businesses don’t get back to normal quickly after a disaster, 90% of them will fail within one year.

Unable to persevere in the face of difficulties is a threat for customer acquisition. Customers will reject your business, regardless of how detailed you are with customer onboarding templates.

Also read: 11 best ways to Improve Personal Development and Self-Growth and its Benefit on our Life

How do I test my plan?

Businesses today can approach business continuity planning testing in many different ways. Understanding the common tasks of all test types is important. They all require understanding your plan, putting it into action, and identifying opportunities for improvement. It’s how you approach your plan and what resources you have available that will make the difference.

It might be a good idea to look at the software testing process as a quality assurance. First, you need to have a clear vision of the things that you are trying to improve or change. Next, include everyone involved and have a dedicated team of people assigned.

Review of Business Continuity Plan

Modern-day business data can be easily preserved thanks to cloud services. To track progress, for example, when we are calculating CSAT we might use a cloud graph. These services are not a panacea. Make backups and keep track of which cloud services you use.

Also read: How to choose The Perfect Domain Name

Tests on the Tabletop

Tabletop testing, also known as structured walkthrough, is a roleplay scenario. The key stakeholders of a business gather together to simulate a business risk and to determine how they will respond. The best continuity plans require human eyes.

Tabletop testing typically looks at several scenarios. Participants review the response procedures and outline their responsibilities to see if they can improve on the overall plan. Start with hacker attacks if you are just starting out. These are common and easy to defeat.

This type of testing is great for getting employees on the same page about what they need to do. This type of testing requires a detailed approach to the plan and often brings together multiple departments. This makes amending and understanding the project easier.

However, tabletop testing is not without its challenges. Tabletop testing is difficult to perform properly and requires extensive documentation to make it useful. You don’t have to do it as often as with other types of testing. In many cases you are more focused on the plan than actually implementing it.

Walk-Through

This is the most challenging form of continuity planning testing. Participating in a walkthrough perform recovery actions, such as testing redundant systems and restoring backups. This includes the plan’s key personnel and all relevant employees.

You might need to travel outside of the office for external data storage locations, or localization testing. A walkthrough, which is similar to localization testing, ensures that all components of your plan work wherever they are located.

Also read: How To Make 5K Dollars In A Month? 20+ Easy Ways To Make $5,000 Fast + Tips!

How often should I test my plan?

The frequency of testing depends on the needs of your business and the resources available to you. Detail plan testing is not something you can do every single day, as you can see. To be truly effective, even at a basic level it will require multiple people from different departments.

It is also important to think about what you are testing. Businesses today face many threats. However, some are more likely than others. If you live in an area that is susceptible to flooding, it may be a good idea to concentrate on your business’s flood response. However, you should also consider common threats such as data breaches which can be addressed with a security assessment.

Also read: Top 10 IoT Mobile App Development Trends to Expect in 2023

What else should I consider?

Documentation is the most important part of any test. Take notes on everything that is useful and document your testing. To make the testing worthwhile, you must also follow-up on these actions.

You should increase your frequency for any major changes in your business, such as moving premises or increasing the size of your workforce. These big changes can have a profound impact on the continuity plan.

Tell your entire workforce about the plan and encourage them to participate where possible. You might be able to discover new and valuable ideas like wiping sensitive files off your hard drives.

Your Business Continuity Plan can be viewed as an organic component, which means it is subject to revision and evolution. This will help you do a great job in keeping your business safe for the future.

Test Et Avis Sur Le Sèche

Les Plus

Des résultats fantastiques et rapides

Léger

Attachement magnétique des diffuseurs

Les Moins

Le câble d’alimentation pourrait être plus long

Etui de voyage non fourni

Seulement deux vitesses

Notre verdict

Le Laifen Swift Special offre des résultats dignes du Dyson Supersonic mais pour un prix bien plus avantageux. Il est élégant, performant et intègre les dernières technologies en matière de séchage. Son modèle standard n’est fourni qu’avec un seul embout, pour obtenir la gamme complète des trois accessoires, vous devrez payer un peu plus cher.

Les meilleurs prix : Laifen Swift

Vendeur

Prix

$170.20

Voir offre

Avec son design reprenant la forme d’un maillet, et ses reflets métalliques brillants, le Laifen Swift Special est un sèche-cheveux d’une grande beauté. À première vue, on pourrait penser qu’il s’agit d’un appareil de luxe au prix élevé.

Mais la surprise est là : le Swift est bien moins cher que ce que l’on pourrait croire.

Design

Elégant

Léger

Le Swift Special est disponible en quatre couleurs : noir mat, bleu argenté (testé ici), blanc perle et rouge rubis. Conformément aux dernières tendances en matière de design des sèche-cheveux, le moteur haute vitesse du Swift, capable de tourner à 110 000 tr/min, se trouve à l’intérieur de sa poignée de 18 cm de long. L’arrivée d’air est en bas, juste au-dessus du câble d’alimentation.

Ajoutez à cela une tête de 9 cm qui peut propulser jusqu’à 13 litres d’air par seconde, à l’image du Dyson Supersonic, et vous obtenez un sèche-cheveux rapide avec un poids centré plus convivial, que vous pouvez utiliser plus près de votre cuir chevelu sans risquer d’aspirer des cheveux dans la sortie d’air.

C’est un sèche-cheveux léger, il ne pèse que 407 g, soit 153 g de moins que le Dyson Supersonic (sans accessoires). Bien que le cordon d’alimentation aurait pu être un peu plus long, il mesure tout de même 1,8 m, de quoi atteindre votre miroir à partir d’une prise de courant sans avoir recours à une rallonge.

Jusqu’à présent, tout va bien. Mais quid des affirmations de Laifen concernant la technologie de contrôle thermique qui protège les cheveux des dommages extrêmes, et la vitesse de l’air de 22 291 mètres par seconde ? Quid de la technologie d’ions négatifs de 200 000 000 par cm3, qui renforce la brillance et la douceur des cheveux et réduit les frisottis et la sécheresse ?

Dans la boîte

La boîte contient le Swift Special, un manuel, une carte de contrôle de qualité et 3 embouts de coiffage magnétique (deux en bec et un circulaire avec picots). Ici, il s’agit du Swift Special, en revanche si vous optez pour le Swift standard, 28 € moins cher, alors vous n’aurez qu’un seul embout.

Foundry

Le diffuseur a un diamètre de 14 cm avec des picots qui dépassent de 2 cm les minuscules trous de dispersion. Si vous avez des cheveux bouclés, ondulés ou frisés, vous bénéficiez d’un véritable soutien pour vos boucles pendant le séchage.

Les accessoires sont magnétiques, vous n’avez aucun effort à fournir pour les insérer

La buse standard filtre l’air jusqu’à une ouverture très étroite de 8 cm de long, elle offre un séchage intense et ciblé, et la coiffante, plus courte et plus large, permet de sécher les cheveux rapidement.

Comme les accessoires sont magnétiques, vous n’avez aucun effort à fournir pour les insérer ; il suffit de placer l’embout désiré à l’extrémité de l’appareil pour qu’il soit prêt à fonctionner, prêt-à-sécher.

Contrôle

Les commandes se présentent sous la forme d’un bouton et d’un interrupteur sur le manche du Swift. Le bouton, situé à peu près à l’endroit où se posera naturellement votre pouce, permet de régler la chaleur. Il passe de froid à tiède, puis à chaud et vice-versa. Vous pouvez également appuyer longuement sur cette commande pour que le sèche-cheveux change automatiquement de réglage de chaleur. Au-dessus, a été placé le bouton d’allumage, qui sert également de passer d’une vitesse à l’autre (rappellons qu’il n’y en a que deux).

Ce que nous avons particulièrement apprécié dans ces commandes, c’est la possibilité de régler le sèche-cheveux sur un mode froid sans avoir à maintenir un bouton enfoncé avec le pouce ; cela facilite grandement le séchage à froid des cheveux pendant de longues périodes.

l’arrêt soudain du souffle émis est un vrai bonheur pour les oreilles, car il ne laisse pas de bruit assourdissant après le séchage

L’extrémité de la tête du Swift Special intègre un système de couleurs (bleu, orange ou rouge) automatique, il vous indique le niveau de chaleur diffusée. C’est une belle et subtile touche permettant de vérifier visuellement la chaleur utilisée, au lieu de devoir retirer le sèche-cheveux pour vérifier le niveau activé.

Foundry

Laifen indique que la température de l’air froid correspond à la température ambiante, celle de l’air chaud à 50°C et l’air chaud à 80°C.

Nous avons trouvé cela assez exact, mais attention : la température de l’air chaud est vraiment très élevée. En ce qui concerne la vitesse, la première vitesse est plutôt bruyante, tandis que la seconde donne l’impression d’être pris dans une tornade. Toutefois, l’arrêt soudain du souffle émis est un vrai bonheur pour les oreilles, car il ne laisse pas de bruit assourdissant après le séchage. D’ailleurs, ses rivaux de même génération ont aussi cet effet.

Le résultat a été similaire à celui d’un brushing volumineux de type salon

Performances

Temps de séchage rapide

Confort d’utilisation

La technologie ionique réduit les frisottis

Nos cheveux ont mis sept à huit minutes à sécher, alors qu’il en faudrait habituellement entre dix et douze. La vitesse et la concentration de l’air permettent de se concentrer spécifiquement sur différentes sections des racines pour obtenir un bon brushing. De plus, la puissance de l’air, avec un passage du chaud au froid sans transition, offre un gain de temps considérable, et les cheveux n’étaient pas trop secs non plus. Nous avons particulièrement apprécié le rendu sur les pointes, mais aussi de manière générale sans électricité statique ni frisottis. Le résultat a été similaire à celui d’un brushing volumineux de type salon.

Le poids léger du sèche-cheveux aide beaucoup dans la manipulation, qui est largement plus aisée.

Le passage du chaud à froid et inversement se fait sans problème. Cependant, nous aurions préféré que les boutons physiques soient inversés, en haut le bouton s’allumage/réglage de chaleur, juste en dessous celui contrôlant les vitesses. A plusieurs reprises, nous nous sommes emmêlés les pinceaux. Sinon, dans l’ensemble, les résultats obtenus avec le Swift étaient excellents.

Foundry

Prix et disponibilité

Le Laifen Swift Special est disponible sur le site Internet du fabricant, au prix de 175,09 €, chez la Fnac et Cdiscount. Sa version standard, avec uniquement 1 buse au lieu de 3, est à 147,77 €. En comparasion, il y a le Hair Glory de Dreame qui coûte 109 €, il n’est fourni qu’avec un embout, toutefois, il propose 4 modes de séchage et 2 vitesses.

Le Special est fourni seul, sans pochette de transport ou de rangement, néanmoins celle-ci est vendue séparément à 17,50 €, et si vous perdez vos buses, sachez qu’elles sont chacune disponibles à 17,50 € également.

Conclusion

Laifen a créé un excellent sèche-cheveux pour son prix. Il est élégant, compact et fonctionne très bien. Il donnera éclat et volume à votre chevelure.

Certes, il ne s’agit pas d’un appareil bon marché, il n’est pas aussi cher que nombreux de ses concurrents, mais il est vraiment performant. Si vous vous séchez régulièrement vos cheveux et que vous souhaitez un sèche-cheveux facile à manipuler, silencieux et rapide, alors optez pour le Laifen Swift (Special).

Pour découvrir d’autres alternatiives, consultez notre sélection des meilleurs sèche-cheveux et des meilleurs lisseurs.

Adaptation du test réalisé par Alex Greenwood et paru sur Tech Advisor de langue anglaise

Fiche technique

Fréquence : 50/60Hz 

2 vitesses

4 modes de séchage (Froid, Doux, Chaud et Alternatif) 

Moteur à haute vitesse de 110 000 tr/min 

3 embouts 

Technologie ionique  

3 anneaux de couleurs

277 x 70 x 89 mm

407 g

Researchers Test Electric Iodine Propulsion Engine For Satellites In Orbit

Researchers test electric iodine propulsion engine for satellites in orbit

Satellites orbiting the Earth today are fitted with thrusters to help them achieve the desired orbit and stay there. Today, the thrusters aboard the satellites rely on electricity used to ionize and push xenon particles for thrust. As xenon atoms are ionized, they can build thrust due to their weight. The challenge with utilizing xenon for thrust board satellites is that the gas is rare, expensive, and hard to chúng tôi new electric propulsion engine that was recently tested-fired in orbit utilizes an alternative propellant- iodine. The in-orbit test was conducted by a company called ThrustMe, utilizing iodine as a propellant. ThrustMe believes its engine could be used to make satellites cheaper and more efficient than using current technologies.

The major benefit of using iodine is that it’s abundant and is cheaper than xenon. Another big benefit of iodine is that it’s able to be stored as a solid without pressurization. Before the in-orbit test, the iodine engine was used in ground-based tests that indicated the technology was feasible for small-scale engines for spacecraft.

For its in-orbit test, company researchers used iodine to power a 44 pound CubeSat satellite. The test engine is called NPT30-I2, and it was launched into orbit on November 6, 2023. While in orbit, it performed maneuvers successfully, and researchers discovered iodine could achieve higher ionization efficiency than xenon.

ThrustMe believes in addition to all the benefits mentioned above, iodine-based engines could be significantly smaller and simpler than the engines currently used aboard satellites. Smaller engines for satellites means more room for payload and instruments in the same size chassis. Simpler engines would mean less opportunity for failure. The main reason the iodine engines can be significantly smaller is because there would need to be no high-pressure tank since iodine can be stored as a solid.

After its successful demonstration, the next steps in the testing program to develop the propulsion system can proceed. While preparing for the orbital tests with the small-scale engine, researchers have also been developing versions with increased performance. In addition, team members are also working on an extensive ground-based endurance test program to explore the limits of the technology.

As the price for launching satellites continues to come down thanks to companies like SpaceX and others, a massive number of satellites is expected to be placed into orbit in the next decade. ThrustMe wants to find ways to make satellites more affordable and efficient, allowing more exploration and analysis of our planet and the universe. While the project is performing well, researchers note there are challenges they have to overcome.

One challenge is the corrosive nature of iodine that requires satellite components to be protected by ceramics. Another challenge is improving the responsiveness of the iodine engines to be on par with those of current xenon components. Technology of this sort could have significant implications for all types of industries.

Perhaps, in the future, companies like SpaceX and others looking to surround the planet with a constellation of satellites to provide Internet connectivity can utilize the new propulsion system. It would help make the satellites cheaper, which would, in turn, make the service cheaper, allowing more people to utilize it. Recently, SpaceX placed 53 additional Starlink satellites into orbit and has plans for tens of thousands of additional satellites surrounding the planet.

Applying The Craap Test & Evaluating Sources

The CRAAP test is a method to evaluate the credibility of a source you are using.

When conducting research, it’s important to use credible sources. They ensure the trustworthiness of your argument and strengthen your conclusions.

There are a lot of sources out there, and it can be hard to determine whether they are sufficiently credible, but doing so is an important information literacy skill. To help, librarians at California State University developed the CRAAP test in 2004.

What is the CRAAP test?The CRAAP test has 5 main components

Currency: Is the source up to date?

Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?

Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field?

Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly?

Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?

Here are some examples using different sources.

Books

While books are often considered among the most reliable sources, it is still important to pay attention to the author, publisher, and motive behind the publication.

Some books are commercially-motivated or sponsored, which affects their credibility. As a general rule, academic publishers and university presses are often considered credible.

When evaluating a book, ask yourself:

Is this the most current book available on the topic that I’m studying?

Publishing multiple editions is a signal that the author is motivated to keep the information current.

Are they a trusted expert in their field?

It should be clear what criteria the publishing house follows for editing, fact-checking, and publishing.

The main purpose should be to educate the reader, not to try to convince them to buy or believe something.

Journal articles

Academic journals are one of the best resources you can turn to during your research process. They are often peer reviewed, which means they have undergone a rigorous editing process prior to publication.

When evaluating a journal article, ask yourself:

Who participates on each review panel should be readily available within each article.

A quick Google Scholar search will show you if the author has published other articles or been cited by other scholars. The function called “Cited By” can show you where the author has been cited. A high number of “Cited By” results can often be a measurement of credibility.

Has it had to retract many articles?

You can find high-quality journals via Google Scholar or your institution’s library. Your library also may have access to journals behind paywalls.

A few examples of databases where you can find well-regarded academic journals are: JSTOR, EBSCO, Sage Publications, PubMed, and Project Muse.

News articles

News articles can be tricky to evaluate. Many news sources are eminently reliable, with long histories of fact-based and trustworthy journalism.

In the age of “fake news”, it’s more important than ever to carefully evaluate news articles, especially those found online. News sources are often best used to situate your argument or ground your research, with more academic sources making up the “meat” of your analysis.

When evaluating a news source, ask yourself:

Reputable news sources commit to fact-checking their content, issuing corrections and withdrawals if necessary, and only associating with credible journalists.

Credible journalists commit to reporting factual information in an unbiased manner, and prescribe to a code of ethics shared within the profession.

The article shouldn’t favor one side of the story or one point of view, but present all sides fairly.

Links in news articles can often be a great place to find valuable primary source material.

Note that letters to the editor and other types of opinion pieces (often called op-eds) are opinion-based by nature, and usually not credible.

Web sources

While very common, websites are often among the most challenging to evaluate for credibility.

They are not subject to the peer-review or rigorous editing process that academic journals or books go through, and websites like Wikipedia can be altered by anyone at any time.

While you will undoubtedly use websites in your research, exercise caution here.

A good first step is to take a look at the URL.

Different URLs denote different types of web sources

Educational resources end in .edu, and are largely considered the most trustworthy in academic settings.

Government-affiliated websites end in .gov, and are often considered credible.

When analyzing web sources, ask yourself:

If you are studying a topic that is frequently changing, such as cutting-edge research or current events, make sure that the information is up to date. If your subject is not as time-sensitive, such as history, the publication date may not matter as much. However, you should still ensure that the website is updated regularly. A website that is out-of-date is often not credible.

What kinds of sources do they lead to? Are those sources credible?

Flashy fonts, pop-ups, and a distracting layout can also be a sign that the content is not credible.

There should be an “About” page denoting the author’s credentials and establishing their expertise in the field. Anonymous content is generally not considered credible.

Try to stick with sources published for educational purposes. Sources attempting to sell you something or convince you of a particular point of view or course of action are not considered credible.

Other interesting articles

If you want to know more about ChatGPT, AI tools, citation, and plagiarism, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Frequently asked questions about the CRAAP test Cite this Scribbr article

George, T. (2023, May 31). Applying the CRAAP Test & Evaluating Sources. Scribbr. Retrieved July 17, 2023,

Cite this article

Update the detailed information about A Test Plan Tool For Simpler Test Case Management on the Bellydancehcm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!